Ok. I think providing inititial notice is fair but we are going to need to take a few things into consideration.

1. The number of times test was performed.
2. The amount of rewards being taken from the reward pool as a result of said testing.
3. Whether or not the author has chosen to decline rewards from the tests.

For point one, if there had been a defined threshold for this (and we will work on this), then this number of testing has exceeded that.

For point 2, the rewards on the table exceed $1.00 STU so not entirely a trivial amount.

For point 3, this option should be used if possible. Would you please explain what had prevented this?

I think 1 flag is sufficient in demonstrating that I nor the individual that had concurred with my flag on Discord disagree on the method by which you are appropriating rewards on the blockchain.

Ok. I was content with leaving one warning flag. Here's how this is going to work.

1. You remove your flag and refrain for testing for rewards.

OR

2. You do not remove your flag and my associates and I will remove the remaining rewards.

You did not offer rationale for not opting out of rewards and this leaves room for the charge that  this is an attempt to game the system.

If you are a novice, I hope you will learn from this experience. Whether it I intentional or not, the activity appears to be abusive so I would avoid it so as to not have problems in the future.