create account

RE: Seeking Consensus on Consensus - DPOS or Delegated Proof of Stake and the Two Generals' Problem by clayop

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @atomrigs/re-iang-seeking-consensus-on-consensus-dpos-or-delegated-proof-of-stake-and-the-two-generals-problem-20170529t222952479z

· @clayop ·
$0.02
I basically agree with him, while have some differences in specific.

For DPOS, monitoring witnesses and removing bad or lazy witnesses are very important. In this sense, 100 seems too big to make dynamics in the top active witness list. I think around 30-50 is a good number.
As he said, 30 votes can make the witnesses dependent on few whales, as Steem is now. A further problem is 30 is too many for individuals to evaluate and monitor witnesses. The bigger the number, the psychological burden will exponentially increase. 1 is good number too, but I personally prefer 3-5, which is similar to the number of "very close relationship".
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorclayop
permlinkre-atomrigs-re-iang-seeking-consensus-on-consensus-dpos-or-delegated-proof-of-stake-and-the-two-generals-problem-20170529t234120637z
categoryeos
json_metadata{"tags":["eos"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-05-29 23:41:24
last_update2017-05-29 23:41:24
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-06-05 23:41:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.019 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length638
author_reputation270,845,899,918,618
root_title"Seeking Consensus on Consensus - DPOS or Delegated Proof of Stake and the Two Generals' Problem"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id3,939,570
net_rshares11,897,774,499
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@kyle.anderson ·
Well if you are not using all of your 100 votes, you should delegate that power to someone who is. Plain and simple.
properties (22)
authorkyle.anderson
permlinkre-clayop-re-atomrigs-re-iang-seeking-consensus-on-consensus-dpos-or-delegated-proof-of-stake-and-the-two-generals-problem-20170602t024758494z
categoryeos
json_metadata{"tags":["eos"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-06-02 02:47:57
last_update2017-06-02 02:47:57
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-06-09 02:47:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length116
author_reputation8,970,579,009,561
root_title"Seeking Consensus on Consensus - DPOS or Delegated Proof of Stake and the Two Generals' Problem"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id4,054,462
net_rshares0
@clayop ·
$0.04
That can end up with the concentration of power.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorclayop
permlinkre-kyleanderson-re-clayop-re-atomrigs-re-iang-seeking-consensus-on-consensus-dpos-or-delegated-proof-of-stake-and-the-two-generals-problem-20170602t031435486z
categoryeos
json_metadata{"tags":["eos"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-06-02 03:14:36
last_update2017-06-02 03:14:36
depth4
children1
last_payout2017-06-09 03:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length48
author_reputation270,845,899,918,618
root_title"Seeking Consensus on Consensus - DPOS or Delegated Proof of Stake and the Two Generals' Problem"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id4,054,937
net_rshares12,892,443,363
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@kyle.anderson ·
This is the drawback of DPOS. The 30 limit also imposes a concentration of power. It ultimately depends on the scale of the network.
properties (22)
authorkyle.anderson
permlinkre-clayop-re-kyleanderson-re-clayop-re-atomrigs-re-iang-seeking-consensus-on-consensus-dpos-or-delegated-proof-of-stake-and-the-two-generals-problem-20170602t133734555z
categoryeos
json_metadata{"tags":["eos"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-06-02 13:37:33
last_update2017-06-02 13:37:33
depth5
children0
last_payout2017-06-09 13:37:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length132
author_reputation8,970,579,009,561
root_title"Seeking Consensus on Consensus - DPOS or Delegated Proof of Stake and the Two Generals' Problem"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id4,067,489
net_rshares0