create account

RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by bleujay

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus

· @bleujay ·
$0.09
Thank you for posting @dantheman.

This in depth material regarding the Blockchain delineates the details we are in need of.  Appreciate your attention to detail and walking us through it.

All the best to you.  Cheers.
👍  
properties (23)
authorbleujay
permlinkre-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170327t212456380z
categoryetheruem
json_metadata{"tags":["etheruem"],"users":["dantheman"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-27 21:25:00
last_update2017-03-27 21:25:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-04-27 23:55:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.066 HBD
curator_payout_value0.022 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length219
author_reputation213,449,040,661,953
root_title"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,868,216
net_rshares208,138,243,871
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)