Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus
Thank you for posting @dantheman. This in depth material regarding the Blockchain delineates the details we are in need of. Appreciate your attention to detail and walking us through it. All the best to you. Cheers.
author | bleujay |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170327t212456380z |
category | etheruem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["etheruem"],"users":["dantheman"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2017-03-27 21:25:00 |
last_update | 2017-03-27 21:25:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-27 23:55:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.066 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 219 |
author_reputation | 213,449,040,661,953 |
root_title | "Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,868,216 |
net_rshares | 208,138,243,871 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fuzzyvest | 0 | 208,138,243,871 | 4% |