create account

RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by dantheman

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @demotruk/re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170327t215151539z

· @dantheman ·
Fixed...  thanks for pointing that out.
👍  ,
👎  , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-demotruk-re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170327t215724526z
categoryetheruem
json_metadata{"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-27 21:57:24
last_update2017-03-27 21:57:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-04-27 23:55:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length39
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,868,599
net_rshares-13,369,063,548,941
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)