RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by destbest

etheruem · @destbest · Mar 29 '17 (edited)

### TLDR / ELI5 :
##### What data should a blockchain keep track of:
1st Block: Alice receive 10 from the blockchain
2nd Block: Alice send 10 to Bob
##### What data should a blockchain NOT keep track of:
3rd Block (State): Alice has 0 and Bob has 10 

##### Why:
Scalability / Performance
&nbsp;

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

👍 lordguan, hql2016

`author`	destbest
`permlink`	re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170329t183924628z
`category`	etheruem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-03-29 18:39:27
`last_update`	2017-03-29 18:42:12
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-04-27 23:55:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	328
`author_reputation`	1,315,808,423,842
`root_title`	"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	2,890,437
`net_rshares`	0
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
hql2016	0 B		0	100%
lordguan	0 B		0	100%