Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus
` f1(i) =f2(i,j)` as long as j=0. j could be equivalent to partitions in the ledger .
author | gutzofter |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170328t022953355z |
category | etheruem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2017-03-28 02:29:54 |
last_update | 2017-03-28 02:29:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-04-27 23:55:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.036 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 86 |
author_reputation | 7,621,537,677,018 |
root_title | "Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 2,870,675 |
net_rshares | 118,758,188,965 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dragosroua | 0 | 108,176,633,560 | 100% | ||
raluca | 0 | 10,581,555,405 | 100% |