create account

RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by gutzofter

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus

· @gutzofter ·
$0.05
` f1(i) =f2(i,j)` as long as j=0.

j could be equivalent to partitions in the ledger .
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorgutzofter
permlinkre-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170328t022953355z
categoryetheruem
json_metadata{"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-28 02:29:54
last_update2017-03-28 02:29:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-04-27 23:55:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.036 HBD
curator_payout_value0.012 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length86
author_reputation7,621,537,677,018
root_title"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,870,675
net_rshares118,758,188,965
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)