Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus
Nice posting. I am dummy in cryptocureency but. I know your idea have purpose to make steemit better. Nice ! :)
| author | happyphoenix |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170328t012002492z |
| category | etheruem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-03-28 01:20:06 |
| last_update | 2017-03-28 01:20:06 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-27 23:55:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 111 |
| author_reputation | 70,121,087,908,890 |
| root_title | "Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,870,252 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks