create account

RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by lukestokes

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus

· @lukestokes ·
$0.05
It clicked for me at:

> Debugging Code should not be part of Production

I didn't realize how much of this technology was about proving mistakes weren't made to such a degree. I wonder if these early days of blockchain technology are too conservative or if that's required for trust when dealing with important financial transactions.

Thanks again for continuing to post here. I always learn something new.
👍  
properties (23)
authorlukestokes
permlinkre-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170328t023508462z
categoryetheruem
json_metadata{"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-28 02:35:09
last_update2017-03-28 02:35:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-04-27 23:55:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.036 HBD
curator_payout_value0.011 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length408
author_reputation554,601,966,217,919
root_title"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,870,722
net_rshares118,243,756,558
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)