create account

RE: Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus by marceltoma

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus

· @marceltoma ·
"...the exact form the game state takes is irrelevant so long as all players agree on the validity of new game inputs"

From what I understood, trying to generate a canonical state doesn't make sense because all participants had already agreed with the state of the transaction in the first place when it was included in the ledger.

I would say that it makes sense if you have the ability to make the participants agree in the transaction very fast, which I assume is the case of EOS, because you basically have very few of them.
If not, making all participants agree with every transaction would take  longer, that's why I assume you have to pack those transaction in a block and validate it with hashes.
properties (22)
authormarceltoma
permlinkre-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20181108t072032367z
categoryetheruem
json_metadata{"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-11-08 07:20:33
last_update2018-11-08 07:20:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-11-15 07:20:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length706
author_reputation0
root_title"Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id74,899,392
net_rshares0