Viewing a response to: @dantheman/blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus
Way above my blockchain head, but regardless, an interesting read.
| author | pilot |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-dantheman-blockchain-state-representation-should-be-abstract-and-not-part-of-consensus-20170327t220310642z |
| category | etheruem |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["etheruem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-03-27 22:03:18 |
| last_update | 2017-03-27 22:03:18 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-27 23:55:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 66 |
| author_reputation | 7,606,244,373,236 |
| root_title | "Blockchain State Representation should be Abstract and not part of Consensus" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,868,662 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks