RE: How to Measure Consensus on Group Values by dan

`author`	dan
`permlink`	rftf7z
`category`	fractally
`json_metadata`	{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
`created`	2022-07-30 04:02:24
`last_update`	2022-07-30 04:02:24
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2022-08-06 04:02:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.098 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.098 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	128
`author_reputation`	155,470,101,136,708
`root_title`	"How to Measure Consensus on Group Values"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	115,274,160
`net_rshares`	269,582,692,546
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
antisocialist	0 B		268,751,921,449	50%
yayogerardo	0 B		830,771,097	50%

$0.03

I'm with ya.
There are two books that seem to outline it much better than I can:

[The Iron Heel](https://archive.org/details/ironhee00lond/mode/2up) explains why what we have is what we get in chapter 9.
If you can dispute the math in that chapter I am all ears.

[Looking Backwards](https://archive.org/details/lookingbackward01bellgoog) offers an optimization to what we currently have.

Personally, I like this short story:  [And Then There Were None](https://www.abelard.org/e-f-russell.php) for its direct approach to the problem, but if you check the publication dates of those you will see that having solutions already out there is no guarantee of their success.

They don't have to burn books when nobody reads them.™

👍 dustsweeper, sim31

`author`	antisocialist
`permlink`	re-dan-rftiww
`category`	fractally
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["fractally"],"app":"peakd/2022.07.1"}
`created`	2022-07-30 05:22:09
`last_update`	2022-07-30 05:22:09
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2022-08-06 05:22:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.014 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.013 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	728
`author_reputation`	276,355,731,428,267
`root_title`	"How to Measure Consensus on Group Values"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	115,275,323
`net_rshares`	38,917,588,342
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
sim31	0 B		8,189,969,723	100%
dustsweeper	0 B		30,727,618,619	4.07%