RE: The problem of project delisting and proposed solution by jringo

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @artstein/the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution

gridcoin · @jringo · Feb 15 '18

$3.48

Thanks for the write-up!

For further reading, take a look at the two proposed whitelist procedures (including the greylist) that address some of these issues. One is being voted on right now!

[Adding a Project and the Greylist - Voting going on now!](https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/194)

[Delisting a project - Work in Progress Proposal](https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/201)

Otherwise, I think you have 2 good points that havn't been discussed at length -- the grace period of a project for when it is greylisted, along with possible continued payout during magnitude decay.

I will post these ideas on the GitHub unless you would like to.

---

Personally, I don't entirely agree with rewarding magnitude decay for a removed project. The goal is to work toward rewarding actual work done. Rewarding decay is not this. 

In addition, I can imagine someone noticing a project will be dewhitelisted in 2-3 weeks, moving their hardware to that project, charging their mag on that project as other people leave the project, and reaping the benefits of a low mag distribution pool as their mag reduces to 0 while their hardware now crunches away on another project.

👍 cm-steem, parejan, barton26, h202, ilikechocolate, hownixt

`author`	jringo
`permlink`	re-artstein-the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution-20180215t142433040z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"links":["https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/194","https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/201"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-15 14:24:30
`last_update`	2018-02-15 14:24:30
`depth`	1
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2018-02-22 14:24:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	2.626 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.856 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,220
`author_reputation`	29,720,071,239,659
`root_title`	"The problem of project delisting and proposed solution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	37,757,790
`net_rshares`	511,386,552,541
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
cm-steem	472,121,996,658	100%
barton26	5,940,749,649	100%
parejan	24,475,020,690	100%
hownixt	2,037,121,223	100%
h202	3,671,130,866	100%
ilikechocolate	3,140,533,455	100%

@h202 · Feb 15 '18 (edited)

$0.33

> Personally, I don't entirely agree with rewarding magnitude decay for a removed project. The goal is to work toward rewarding actual work done. Rewarding decay is not this.

One *could* argue that the rewards from decaying mag are exactly equal to the rewards "lost" during the initial buildup of mag, see the plot in @parejan 's comment on this post. In that sense it would be natural to continue rewarding decaying mag. This is an ugly solution though. I hope many of these problems will be swept away by a successful implementation of the roadmap proposals.

👍 jringo, parejan, ilikechocolate

`author`	h202
`permlink`	re-jringo-re-artstein-the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution-20180215t205307662z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"users":["parejan"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-15 20:53:06
`last_update`	2018-02-15 20:53:33
`depth`	2
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2018-02-22 20:53:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.250 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.078 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	562
`author_reputation`	260,059,645,359
`root_title`	"The problem of project delisting and proposed solution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	37,833,942
`net_rshares`	52,730,979,894
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
jringo	41,495,338,426	100%
parejan	8,158,340,230	33%
ilikechocolate	3,077,301,238	100%

@jringo · Feb 15 '18

$0.02

I was waiting for this response! = )

In my opinion, the possibility to exploit payout for power-down (due to the likelihood of a lower pool of users working on the project) outweighs the benefit to paying mag lost during charging.

In general, I agree and also hope the proposed roadmap developments will look to solve these issues.

👍 h202

`author`	jringo
`permlink`	re-h202-re-jringo-re-artstein-the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution-20180215t222736852z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-15 22:27:36
`last_update`	2018-02-15 22:27:36
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-02-22 22:27:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.018 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	333
`author_reputation`	29,720,071,239,659
`root_title`	"The problem of project delisting and proposed solution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	37,849,963
`net_rshares`	3,733,003,858
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
h202	0 B		3,733,003,858	100%

@parejan · Feb 15 '18 (edited)

$0.02

I think there would be some ways to further develop this but as we only have limited resources available, it would be more beneficial to use them for new developments in the proposed roadmap instead of using these resources for temporary fix. I think we have the same position here...

👍 h202

`author`	parejan
`permlink`	re-jringo-re-h202-re-jringo-re-artstein-the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution-20180215t225157234z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-15 22:51:57
`last_update`	2018-02-15 22:55:33
`depth`	4
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-02-22 22:51:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.018 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	284
`author_reputation`	18,366,999,401,423
`root_title`	"The problem of project delisting and proposed solution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	37,853,942
`net_rshares`	3,650,506,535
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
h202	0 B		3,650,506,535	100%

1 reply

@minhazahmed · Feb 15 '18

nice post

properties (22)

`author`	minhazahmed
`permlink`	re-jringo-re-artstein-the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution-20180215t235816803z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-15 23:58:21
`last_update`	2018-02-15 23:58:21
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2018-02-22 23:58:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	9
`author_reputation`	28,312,658,593
`root_title`	"The problem of project delisting and proposed solution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	37,864,301
`net_rshares`	0