create account

RE: Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus by rahul.stan

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus

· @rahul.stan ·
$0.03
If the reward curve becomes linear then what's the point of holding large steem power? Can someone explain?
👍  
properties (23)
authorrahul.stan
permlinkre-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t160543788z
categoryhardfork-17
json_metadata{"tags":["hardfork-17"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-20 16:07:30
last_update2017-03-20 16:07:30
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-04-20 18:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.027 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length107
author_reputation27,828,226,977,128
root_title"Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,782,488
net_rshares49,388,752,993
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@williambanks ·
$0.09
You would have linearly more reward power instead of geometrically and when the price of steem jumps back to $1.00 because a crapton more people choose to hold any at all, you'll benefit from the price increase .  

What's the point of holding massive SP right now?  The pool is constantly shrinking at least in part because people come here and feel disheartened when they see the HUGE cliff they have to climb for their vote to mean anything at all.

Look at what happened when Dan left and the @abit started the experiment.  The fact is "knowing my vote matters" makes me want to buy more but I don't have exponentially more money, so it feels good to know that even a linear amount helps a lot.

There is no benefit at all in massive centralized holding of SP.  All it means is that the distribution is mimicking the real world where we have 1%'rs who get to dictate the financial system to the rest of us chumps.
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorwilliambanks
permlinkre-rahulstan-re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t161852103z
categoryhardfork-17
json_metadata{"tags":["hardfork-17"],"users":["abit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-20 16:18:54
last_update2017-03-20 16:18:54
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-04-20 18:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.079 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length917
author_reputation90,708,691,850,244
root_title"Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,782,636
net_rshares150,758,639,170
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@rahul.stan ·
$0.03
Thanks I  get it now but I still have a question. Won't it be easy to game the system by having many accounts?
👍  
properties (23)
authorrahul.stan
permlinkre-williambanks-re-rahulstan-re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t162154080z
categoryhardfork-17
json_metadata{"tags":["hardfork-17"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-20 16:23:45
last_update2017-03-20 16:23:45
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-04-20 18:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.023 HBD
curator_payout_value0.006 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length110
author_reputation27,828,226,977,128
root_title"Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,782,697
net_rshares49,388,752,993
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@williambanks ·
$2.13
No you still have the cost to acquire steem power as a significant factor.  

Having many accounts doesn't change this cost consideration and still provides a dilution effect, but perhaps not as extreme as the exponentiation or whatever they're calling it going on now.  Furthermore, you'll get far more benefit with the "Proxy  or delegate SP", than by having multiple accounts, so the incentive to do that goes away.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorwilliambanks
permlinkre-rahulstan-re-williambanks-re-rahulstan-re-steemitblog-patience-with-the-hardfork-there-must-be-consensus-20170320t164830042z
categoryhardfork-17
json_metadata{"tags":["hardfork-17"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-20 16:48:30
last_update2017-03-20 16:48:30
depth4
children1
last_payout2017-04-20 18:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.599 HBD
curator_payout_value0.532 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length418
author_reputation90,708,691,850,244
root_title"Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,782,989
net_rshares2,243,020,326,457
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)