create account

RE: #NewSteem is Live by miniature-tiger

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @ewkaw/pwxxmi

· @miniature-tiger ·
The CLRC makes it inefficient to vote on posts that will end up with low payouts. The aim being to discourage low value spam posts from extracting rewards without being seen. Unfortunately the level at which it has been set may also dis-incentivise smaller / newer users and also impacts rewarding comments (since each of these cases typically gains small rewards).

Things change and this is where we are at now. Fortunately the Steem environment is very innovative. There is a clear need for methods / behaviours which will allow smaller SP holders to use their votes more efficiently and quality niche / new users to be promoted effectively. It will require some level of aggregation / cooperation but I think that this will happen quite quickly.
👍  
👎  
properties (23)
authorminiature-tiger
permlinkpwy1bj
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-28 11:02:09
last_update2019-08-28 11:02:09
depth4
children5
last_payout2019-09-04 11:02:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length749
author_reputation110,057,226,899,924
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,031,303
net_rshares-7,988,497,649
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ewkaw · (edited)
> The CLRC makes it inefficient to vote on posts that will end up with low payouts. 

This actually also includes my posts and my friends posts. So if my post is inefficient I will get even less votes than I was before. Where will the whales place their votes? On the potentially efficient posts I am guessing. Which is promoting circle jerking even more. 
Why would I vote those small fish instead of voting on those big payout posts too?
If things don't get adjusted my daily earning will drop by half (Total Steem earned comparing from before HF and with yesterday's claim). And I am not the only one here....
The potentially increased curation will not cover that loss.

Which brings us back to the idea of punishing bid bots with this fork. I didn't use bid bots before, but why wouldn't I now start using them now to help my posts reach 20 steem payout, so I don't lose any more than I already did?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorewkaw
permlinkpwy2af
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-28 11:23:03
last_update2019-08-28 11:27:12
depth5
children4
last_payout2019-09-04 11:23:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length904
author_reputation1,161,946,582,703,093
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,031,660
net_rshares1,260,334,284
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@kawaiicrush ·
$0.06
That is what they want. They earn from the bid bots. This is to push the sheep off the cliff.. and while they do it take more from your wallet, both by taking more of what should have been *your* earned rewards, as well as backing you into the corner leaving you no choice but to "buy votes" from bid bots owned by premine whales aka Stinc (Steemit is behind the bots). God help you if they call your content "shit" even if it is original, and then even though you bought the upvote, and they took your money to give you your purchased bid bot vote.. they come at you and tell you it is unworthy of such a vote.. and mass steal the vote that you already paid for from your own pocket by spam calling the steem flag rewards crew.. they will all spam your post with defamatory comments about your content.. smearing you, robbing you, and leaving you wanting to run far far away from Steem. Trust me vote buying is not the answer. You will just line the greedy whales pockets.. if you want Steem that bad instead of buying votes.. just buy Steem with Ether, BTC, etc. And dump it into your own wallet. There you can sit on it and no one can touch it. You don't need to "buy upvotes" to get Steem. Just use the same money you pay the bot owners with for votes.. to buy your own Steem. That is if you even want it anymore.. seeing as they are tanking it.. and it is now dead.

Good luck!
👍  , , , , , , ,
👎  ,
properties (23)
authorkawaiicrush
permlinkpwy63n
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-28 12:45:24
last_update2019-08-28 12:45:24
depth6
children1
last_payout2019-09-04 12:45:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.029 HBD
curator_payout_value0.028 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,382
author_reputation40,788,446,660,861
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,034,319
net_rshares284,250,900,749
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@firealien ·
$0.03
Very smart, don't pay their exorbitant bidbot fees and risks, imagine if I bought a bidbot I would be the laughing stock of town after they stole my money, flagged me, and fucked my sheep off the cliff! lol
👍  , , ,
👎  ,
properties (23)
authorfirealien
permlinkpwzjv5
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-29 06:40:18
last_update2019-08-29 06:40:18
depth7
children0
last_payout2019-09-05 06:40:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.014 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length206
author_reputation-907,455,860,771
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,061,143
net_rshares148,971,592,688
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@miniature-tiger ·
$0.05
For smaller users, the systems / communities / user behaviours that were used under HF20 will need to be adapted to be efficient under HF21.

At the simplest level, one post earning $5 will be worth (*something-like*) twice as much to the author as 5 posts earning $1. 

So communities may look to reward users with a larger amount every 5th post rather than a smaller amount on every post. Users would adapt their behaviours / expectations to this uneven payout schedule.

Users may also post less frequently but with a focus on increased quality in each post.  

This all requires some cooperation between communities / groups of friends and there will be some need for scale in each community to make it work. So it's a less "pure" system than HF20. But I think that these adaptations will come.

I also think that it will be accepted that people will use bidbots to reach the 20 Steem threshold, at least initially. As long as the quality is good and the purchased votes aren't excessive (*and the bidbot is one of the ones that the general community approves of*) it shouldn't be a problem. 

There may also be a blurring between communities / bidbots with communities purchasing delegations to support their users, with some level of funding coming from users. 

But the key is that some adaptation will be necessary.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorminiature-tiger
permlinkpwy43f
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-28 12:02:03
last_update2019-08-28 12:02:03
depth6
children1
last_payout2019-09-04 12:02:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.024 HBD
curator_payout_value0.023 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,323
author_reputation110,057,226,899,924
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,032,570
net_rshares233,652,746,058
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@ewkaw ·
> At the simplest level, one post earning $5 will be worth (something-like) twice as much to the author as 5 posts earning $1.

Ok, so people should post less often. Maybe twice a week... Won't that reduce the overall site traffic? 
That still doesn't solve the post earnings. As a example: If I would vote someone with 100% every day, he will get 5 full votes that way in 5 days. Posting once every 5 days he will get one full vote. I cannot vote with 500%. 


> I also think that it will be accepted that people will use bidbots to reach the 20 Steem threshold, at least initially.

Which will bring more customers to the bot owners instead the other way round as planned. I read something this HF was supposed to reduce/kill/make it harder for bid bots. 

> As long as the quality is good and the purchased votes aren't excessive

If this was taken care of for the past 2-3 years, who will take care of that now?


> But the key is that some adaptation will be necessary.

Yea, that I agree.

Overall... overcomplicating (and this is what I think of HF21 now) things will make it a lot harder to understand and absorb for average user. And not understanding leads to lack of interest. 
On top of that discreet promotion of using bots to reach the 20 Steem and voting on the biggest payed out posts instead supporting small plankton posts. 
Sorry... but I don't see how this HF as a positive change. Hope I am wrong.

P.S. Thanks for taking your time answering me.
properties (22)
authorewkaw
permlinkpwy5n7
categoryhf21
json_metadata{"tags":["hf21"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-08-28 12:35:30
last_update2019-08-28 12:35:30
depth7
children0
last_payout2019-09-04 12:35:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,466
author_reputation1,161,946,582,703,093
root_title"#NewSteem is Live"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id90,033,847
net_rshares0