Viewing a response to: @blocktrades/draft-template-for-proposals
I like it. This is already an 80% solution if not higher. I particularly like the cost summary and phases of work part. Can we add a “back payment” segment? Meaning only a very limited part of the proposal can be funded paying for previous work. Say no more than 10%. This will discourage a lot of back payment and a clear path of point forward auditing. This is a very standard practice in the real world. Thank you for putting it together.
author | azircon |
---|---|
permlink | re-blocktrades-qa9osd |
category | hive-102930 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-102930"],"app":"peakd/2020.05.2"} |
created | 2020-05-13 11:19:27 |
last_update | 2020-05-13 11:19:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-05-20 11:19:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 448 |
author_reputation | 784,130,398,348,946 |
root_title | "Draft template for proposals" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 97,346,322 |
net_rshares | 0 |