That's just the thing. I don't think it's that simple. Many times when I read "Trump said...", but then watch the actual speech or the whole clip, it's taken far out of context. At least the media I usually read is incredibly black & white on the topic, unfortunately. That goes for everything he says and does, including how his policies are presented to me.

Please read my statement as a critic towards media, not a judgement about Trump being bad or good. My point is just that, I don't know what or who he is because the "information" I get is so distorted. On both sides. If I try to find something on the other side of the spectrum, it's just like you say, pure love and worship. Really hard to find something I find solid. 

Thank you! I found it anyway, just re-typing the phrase. And it's an interesting argument indeed - how free should journalism be? Trump apparently puts what he perceives as national security way over free journalism, which is no surprise. I don't see why the report about the strikes could be in any way a threat to national security. But it would be an interesting to discuss the topic apart from what he thinks and says. There's probably a pretty big difference in weighing the two between US and other states.

>It surprises me that there aren't more here. They seem to say they want freedom, and then spend their time in Twitter.

I'd like to bring more people on board, I think I'd have some good contacts. But my first try in getting someone on board was a little frustrating for both of us, so I'm now trying to get more info first, so I can be a better guide. [Here's a post discussing that if you have time and feel like reading it.](https://peakd.com/hive-197333/@beelzael/come-on-board)