Viewing a response to: @arcange/how-would-steem-power-be-redistributed-without-soft-fork-0-22-2-frozen-accounts
It is an interesting view of things, but we will have to wait and see what comes out in the wash of meetings. I am just hoping after this is all said and done that people will re-look at the witness selection process, and the down vote process, and the removal of delegated steem to down vote only accounts.
author | bashadow |
---|---|
permlink | re-arcange-q6jytc |
category | hive-133987 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-133987"],"app":"steempeak/2020.02.6"} |
created | 2020-03-02 06:17:39 |
last_update | 2020-03-02 06:17:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-03-09 06:17:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.011 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 308 |
author_reputation | 100,388,692,638,882 |
root_title | "How would steem power be redistributed without the soft fork 0.22.2 frozen accounts?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,987,628 |
net_rshares | 148,575,052,574 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
arcange | 0 | 56,114,196,630 | 3% | ||
raphaelle | 0 | 1,266,532,663 | 3% | ||
dustsweeper | 0 | 91,194,323,281 | 15.54% |