Viewing a response to: @hive-detectives/re-mrtats-s44agn
>CGTrader is only 1 of the 5 platforms used While you listed some of the products used on different platforms, they are also available on CGTrader. For example; Drone. >That's what hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains say. If NFTs are considered part of the game, they are part of the "incorporated product". This is a highly nuanced part of Intellectual Property. If you can find one where there is an actual similar case with proper licenses purchased and an actual ruling about. I would like to read about it. >It is not. They do not allow you to re-sell them. Yes, they do not allow you to re-sell the model files themselves. That should be pretty obvious. An image however is not the model itself. And if the NFTs that are sold, don't grant to purchaser any rights to the image then there is no violation here. Edit: I am not going to waste more of my time on this, as I do not particularly care whether you or PsyberX is right.
author | mrtats |
---|---|
permlink | re-hive-detectives-s44cmc |
category | hive-140217 |
json_metadata | {"app":"peakd/2023.10.1","tags":["hive-140217"]} |
created | 2023-11-14 15:06:12 |
last_update | 2023-11-14 15:25:42 |
depth | 5 |
children | 14 |
last_payout | 2023-11-21 15:06:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.267 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.267 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 957 |
author_reputation | 12,118,043,429,047 |
root_title | "PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 128,854,223 |
net_rshares | 1,133,892,588,886 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dynamicrypto | 0 | 122,516,391,352 | 56.25% | ||
psyberx | 0 | 913,958,389,368 | 75% | ||
psx-bank | 0 | 97,417,808,166 | 100% |
> they are part of the "incorporated product". The incorporated product in this case is the NFT. Who cares about the game. # .  ## NFT = derivative work # . And even leaving aside legality for a second... # <div class="phishy">This is DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL</div>
author | hive-detectives |
---|---|
permlink | re-mrtats-s44g4j |
category | hive-140217 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"} |
created | 2023-11-14 16:21:57 |
last_update | 2023-11-14 16:48:06 |
depth | 6 |
children | 13 |
last_payout | 2023-11-21 16:21:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 413 |
author_reputation | 4,467,575,682,249 |
root_title | "PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 128,856,031 |
net_rshares | -781,299,017,506 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jacobtothe | 0 | 280,405,411,742 | 40% | ||
baah | 0 | 4,447,509,414 | 100% | ||
psyberx | 0 | -1,066,151,938,662 | -100% |
>NFT = derivative work If the derivative work is too similar to the 3D asset. (Here the printing refers to 3D printing of the asset and selling it. As they are both 3D models. Which would make them too similar.) Whether the NFT is considered part of the game matters. If the NFT is part of the game, the game will be considered for the purposes of the license, not the NFT. As incorporated work would be the game, not the NFT. > This is DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL There is nothing dishonest or unethical about this, if the proper license agreements are followed, and there is no breach of the agreement. Unless the authors of the works sue for breach of the license agreement and the courts decide there has been a breach, there is nothing wrong here.
author | mrtats |
---|---|
permlink | re-hive-detectives-s44ixq |
category | hive-140217 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"} |
created | 2023-11-14 17:22:39 |
last_update | 2023-11-14 17:22:39 |
depth | 7 |
children | 12 |
last_payout | 2023-11-21 17:22:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.348 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.348 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 756 |
author_reputation | 12,118,043,429,047 |
root_title | "PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 128,857,421 |
net_rshares | 1,470,420,295,611 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dynamicrypto | 0 | 161,549,331,526 | 75% | ||
sketchygamerguy | 0 | 12,995,599,778 | 100% | ||
psyberx | 0 | 1,200,400,547,214 | 100% | ||
psx-bank | 0 | 95,474,817,093 | 100% |
> 3D printing [..] as they are both 3D models Tell me where you read 3D printing
author | hive-detectives |
---|---|
permlink | re-mrtats-s44k3o |
category | hive-140217 |
json_metadata | {"tags":"hive-140217"} |
created | 2023-11-14 17:47:51 |
last_update | 2023-11-14 17:48:09 |
depth | 8 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2023-11-21 17:47:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 81 |
author_reputation | 4,467,575,682,249 |
root_title | "PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 128,858,005 |
net_rshares | -759,919,520,595 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jacobtothe | 0 | 284,940,809,399 | 40% | ||
psyberx | 0 | -1,044,860,329,994 | -100% |
I don't see the point of arguing about this anymore. Selling a game with thousands of different assets and selling an NFT with someone else's work are very much different things. And hundreds of similar cases on other blockchains back my statements. # . > Unless the authors of the works sue for breach of the license agreement and the courts decide there has been a breach, there is nothing wrong here Right, innocent until proven guilty. After spending 10/100 K on a court case. Everything is allowed until is decided by a judge, sure. Or just # <div class="phishy">BE ETHICAL</div>
author | hive-detectives |
---|---|
permlink | re-mrtats-s44kbl |
category | hive-140217 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-140217"],"app":"peakd/2023.10.1"} |
created | 2023-11-14 17:52:33 |
last_update | 2023-11-14 17:52:33 |
depth | 8 |
children | 6 |
last_payout | 2023-11-21 17:52:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 590 |
author_reputation | 4,467,575,682,249 |
root_title | "PSYBER-X = PLAGIARISM AND IP THEFT" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 128,858,151 |
net_rshares | -696,263,943,132 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jacobtothe | 0 | 287,229,685,617 | 40% | ||
psyberx | 0 | -983,493,628,749 | -100% |