create account

RE: Turning Explosions Into Thrust by tobixen

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @kralizec/turning-explosions-into-thrust

· @tobixen ·
I fail to understand how chemical explosions can give more trust than a conventional chemical rocket.

At the other hand, [nuclear pulse propulsion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_pulse_propulsion) - propelling a spaceship through nuclear bombs - may make sense since we so far haven't found a way to "tame" the fusion process.
properties (22)
authortobixen
permlinkqt594c
categoryhive-163521
json_metadata{"links":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_pulse_propulsion"],"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-05-15 10:29:03
last_update2021-05-15 10:29:03
depth1
children2
last_payout2021-05-22 10:29:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length334
author_reputation18,276,555,395,725
root_title"Turning Explosions Into Thrust"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id103,719,197
net_rshares0
@kralizec ·
Nuclear pulse propulsion is certainly interesting, but it would face the same problems nuclear energy itself faces - it sounds scary and honestly would only be useful once in space for the most part because of it.

And to the other point, as far as I understand it, the point is not to provide more thrust than rockets, but to provide an alternative that can be used not only to reach orbit but also just to fly around the atmosphere with much lesser costs in terms of storage for the fuel.
properties (22)
authorkralizec
permlinkre-tobixen-qt5lxa
categoryhive-163521
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-163521"],"app":"peakd/2021.04.6"}
created2021-05-15 15:05:36
last_update2021-05-15 15:05:36
depth2
children1
last_payout2021-05-22 15:05:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length490
author_reputation228,510,658,450,281
root_title"Turning Explosions Into Thrust"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id103,722,989
net_rshares0
@tobixen ·
> Nuclear pulse propulsion is certainly interesting, but it would face the same problems nuclear energy itself faces - it sounds scary and honestly would only be useful once in space for the most part because of it.

Indeed.  The concept of lifting up a megasized rocket directly from earth could work out in the 50s or 60s, but not today.  Anyway, if we are to scale out space travels, I think we need to think beyond chemical rockets (explosive or conventional).
properties (22)
authortobixen
permlinkqt5mjg
categoryhive-163521
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-05-15 15:18:57
last_update2021-05-15 15:18:57
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-05-22 15:18:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length464
author_reputation18,276,555,395,725
root_title"Turning Explosions Into Thrust"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id103,723,233
net_rshares0