Agenda 2030 has been a thing for a long time.
It's largely about forcing people into high concentration super-cities, and massively cutting energy production.
It will be a haircut on world population, and will likely also mean lowering the quality of life of huge numbers of people.
When it comes to AI, people are easily made to think it's capabilities are much greater than what they actually are.
The same is true with the capabilities of robotics.

I know someone whose company approached Boston Dynamics to build them a robot for remote locations that would basically only be replacing a fuse.
They were shocked by Boston Dynamic's reply:
"We are confident the unit can get within 10 feet of the fuses."
This was basically them admitting they could not make a robot capable of doing something so simple as changing a fuse. 
Look at how many times ownership of Boston Dynamics has changed in the past 7 or 8 years... Not a sign that the company has valuable IP.

AI/Robotics can replace people, but it's not in the jobs people would expect.
It can replace people who write scripts, code, or design visual work.
It can generate video and music.
It can replace your cashiers, or your money room people with a machine.

But replacing a roof? Fixing a furnace? Welding a break in steel?
What Boston Dynamics has done is created very convincing demos where there are no variables being dealt with in a dynamic way. 
It's all controlled, and pre-programmed.

Chat GPT's functionality is far simpler than most people think. It's not actually performing logical tasks. It's not much different from the way Google's search engine finds you relevant information.