Part 1/6:

# Susan Smith Denied Parole 30 Years After Tragic Deaths of Her Sons

In a heart-wrenching turn of events, Susan Smith has been denied parole for the second time in recent months, thirty years after the shocking murders of her two sons, Michael and Alex. The nature of her crimes remains etched in the memory of those affected, especially their father, David Smith, who has vowed to continue fighting for justice.

## A Father's Grief and Commitment

Part 2/6:

David Smith, the father of the boys, shared poignant reflections on the loss of his children in a recent interview. “I miss them very much, and I love them very much,” he stated, expressing unwavering support for his sons’ memories. His commitment to this cause is evident as he emphasizes the importance of keeping Smith behind bars: “...I will be here every two years going forward to ensure that your death doesn't go in vain.”

His emotional weight resonates deeply as he explores the unbearable grief of burying his children. “I don’t give anything if I can go back and change it,” he lamented, highlighting a sentiment that many can understand – the wish to reverse a moment of irreversible tragedy.

## Susan Smith's Emotional Plea

Part 3/6:

During her recent appearance before the parole board, Susan Smith expressed regret for her actions, stating, “I want to say how very sorry I am.” As tears streamed down her face, she pleaded for mercy, asking for forgiveness for murdering her own sons in 1994. The horrific crime involved drowning three-year-old Michael and one-year-old Alex in a South Carolina lake, a fact that has haunted families and communities alike since that fateful day.

Susan also recounted her lies about the incident, claiming she was carjacked by a Black man. “Fear fueled that lie,” she admitted, stating she didn’t know how to explain her sons' deaths to those who loved them. Her tearful apologies did little to sway the parole board.

## The Parole Board's Decision

Part 4/6:

The parole board's decision was unanimous in denying Susan Smith's request for release. One member recused herself from the vote due to her prior association with Smith in prison. The other five members collectively voted against granting her parole, reinforcing the consensus that her thirty-year sentence was insufficient to atone for the lives lost.

David Smith articulated his opposing view during the hearing, noting that thirty years is merely fifteen years per child. He urged the board to recognize the profound impact of Susan’s actions and their lifelong effect on family and friends. “It’s just not enough,” he stressed as he advocated on behalf of Michael and Alex.

## Future Opportunities for Parole

Part 5/6:

Susan Smith will have another opportunity to seek parole in two years. In the meantime, David Smith and others concerned about the safety of the community and the memory of the boys are prepared to return and speak out against her release.

While it was noted that some individuals spoke in support of Susan's potential release, the overwhelming sentiment was one of opposition. David Smith and over a dozen other community members expressed their desire to see justice continued.

## Conclusion

Part 6/6:

The emotional turmoil of this case continues to resonate deeply within the community. As Susan Smith prepares to make another plea in the future, the Smith family remains steadfast in their commitment to upholding the memories of Michael and Alex and ensuring that their tragic deaths are not forgotten. As both a tragic tale of loss and a lesson in vigilance, this case serves as a somber reminder of the lasting impact of crime on families and communities.