Part 1/9:

**Understanding Recent Russian Missile Attacks in Ukraine**

In a significant turn of events, Russian President Vladimir Putin has confirmed that a recent strike against Ukraine was executed using an *experimental non-nuclear ballistic missile* with a medium range. This announcement comes on the heels of Ukraine's accusations that the Kremlin had deployed an *intercontinental ballistic missile* (ICBM), which typically is designed for delivering long-range nuclear payloads.

Part 2/9:

Recent images obtained by CNN showing missile debris in Dnipro have sparked considerable interest and concern about the nature of this new weapon. In this context, an assessment from retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, the former commander of U.S. Army Forces in Europe, brings valuable insights into the ongoing military dynamics.

**Distinguishing Between Missile Types**

General Hodges emphasizes the critical differences between the types of missiles involved. The term ICBM often stirs fears of nuclear holocaust due to its implications in previous global conflicts. However, Hodges notes that the missile in question has been categorized as *experimental* and likely lacks the full operational capabilities or effectiveness implied by an ICBM designation.

Part 3/9:

He opines that the weapon’s limited effect in Ukraine suggests it did not carry a nuclear warhead and hints at Moscow's intent to leverage the situation to instill fear as a tactic to undermine international support for Ukraine. Such scaremongering, he argues, should be met with caution and consideration of intelligence assessments rather than immediate alarm.

**Continued Nuclear Capabilities and Concerns**

Part 4/9:

Despite classifying the missile as medium range, Hodges warns that the potential for nuclear-capable weapons used in the conflict should not be overlooked. Russia has utilized various missiles against Ukraine that could all theoretically deliver nuclear warheads since the inception of the conflict. This reality underscores the broader context of threats from Moscow amid Ukraine's growing effectiveness with advanced weaponry supplied by the West.

Part 5/9:

Additional complications arose with the reported closure of U.S., Greek, and Spanish embassies in Kyiv, implying heightened concerns about security and potential Russian attacks. General Hodges credits effective intelligence and early warning systems—suggesting that nations acted to preemptively protect their diplomatic personnel based on indications of impending missile strikes.

**Ukraine's Response and International Dynamics**

Part 6/9:

In Kyiv, Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed his views about the missile, suggesting its trajectory might still imply an ICBM. Nevertheless, Western officials have criticized this notion, reiterating that it is more accurately an intermediate range ballistic missile. Reports from CNN’s Nick Paton Walsh highlight Russia’s ongoing efforts to display a diverse arsenal of weaponry while using conventionally armed new missile systems.

Part 7/9:

U.S. officials have reported that, while these experimental missiles may not represent an overwhelming threat—highlighted by their limited stock—this development marks a notable escalation in the current conflict. The U.S. remains committed to supporting Ukraine, having just announced another military aid package to assist air defense capabilities against these new missile threats.

**Ongoing Military Aid and Strategic Challenges**

Part 8/9:

The conversation around missile types and their implications reflects broader strategic challenges on the battlefield. The U.S. acknowledges that Ukraine has faced powerful assaults from various missile types, which often carry larger warheads. Thus, the introduction of new experimental missiles does not necessarily indicate a shift in power balance but showcases Russia's determination to continue ramping up its offensive capabilities.

Furthermore, signs indicate that the U.S. may permit Ukraine to utilize long-range missiles against Russian positions, alongside the transfer of anti-personnel mines, all aimed at fortifying Ukraine's defense amidst gradual, brutal Russian advances.

**Conclusion**

Part 9/9:

As the conflict continues to evolve, the recent developments surrounding missile classifications prompt significant implications for military strategy and international relations. Both Ukraine and its allies must navigate the complex landscape shaped by advanced weaponry and geopolitical maneuvers while remaining committed to countering Russian aggression. The situation is fluid, and the effectiveness of U.S. military aid could become pivotal in shaping the outcome of ongoing hostilities in Ukraine.