RE: A discussion on reposting abuse by apshamilton

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @tarazkp/a-discussion-on-reposting-abuse

hive-174578 · @apshamilton · May 24 '20

$0.05

I also feel that there should be a place for older content that is still relevant, especially when that content earned almost nothing when originally published because I was very new on Steem then.
An example is [this post examining the vulnerabilities of Proof of Work and Proof of Stake blockchains to attack by powerful actors including nation states](https://peakd.com/crypto/@apshamilton/analysis-of-51-attack-by-nation-state-vulnerability-of-pow-vs-pos).

Steem's later experience with Justin Sun proved out this vulnerability.

👍 tarazkp

`author`	apshamilton
`permlink`	re-tarazkp-qaugjs
`category`	hive-174578
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["hive-174578"],"app":"peakd/2020.05.4"}
`created`	2020-05-24 16:31:06
`last_update`	2020-05-24 16:31:06
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2020-05-31 16:31:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.024 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.025 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	533
`author_reputation`	212,408,778,971,080
`root_title`	"A discussion on reposting abuse"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	97,562,339
`net_rshares`	176,012,540,496
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
tarazkp	0 B		176,012,540,496	5%

@papilloncharity · May 24 '20

I am in total agreement with this, lawyers rely on case law and if a judgement was made many years ago in a case similar to a current case, they are allowed to present it.
So why can members not refresh an old post, especially if it relates to a current situation and post it?
By refresh, I mean supply a reason for the repost and edit the post to suit its current application.

properties (22)

`author`	papilloncharity
`permlink`	re-apshamilton-qauif9
`category`	hive-174578
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["hive-174578"],"app":"peakd/2020.05.4"}
`created`	2020-05-24 17:11:42
`last_update`	2020-05-24 17:11:42
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2020-05-31 17:11:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	378
`author_reputation`	2,511,912,534,200,981
`root_title`	"A discussion on reposting abuse"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	97,563,644
`net_rshares`	0

@tarazkp · May 24 '20

:D

Yours is May 3rd 2018

This one is May 5th 2018:

https://steemit.com/steemit/@tarazkp/discussion-to-change-witness-voting-procedures

I can't find the post where I talk about the stake attack from a large player, but more than one person told me I was crazy as no one would buy that much Steem...

properties (22)