Viewing a response to: @vermithrax/re-alphacore-qvetcw
if everyone piles onto 5:01 then I will vote at 4:55 and the overall curation for that post is reduced, then someone else clips down to 4 for their personal gain and before you know it 100 accounts are scattered across the 1st 5 minutes of any giant account fighting for the scraps of curation that even remain EXACTLY HOW IT SHOULD BE now we get to slap the back of our wrists together and have ""curation"" on the most gigantic and well known always-voted super accounts without reverse auction penalty. It was bad enough that people thought reducing it to 5 minutes was reasonable, and now it's 0. Unless there is some brilliant detail I'm missing, then everyone that thinks this is a good long-term idea is completely deluded. the reverse auction was much more than some shallow "anti-bot" mechanic but maybe I am the deluded one, for thinking anyone would know that
| author | alphacore |
|---|---|
| permlink | qvit2l |
| category | hive |
| json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
| created | 2021-06-30 15:16:39 |
| last_update | 2021-06-30 15:19:15 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2021-07-07 15:16:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.041 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.042 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 873 |
| author_reputation | 23,829,051,779,241 |
| root_title | "Hive Hardfork 25 is on the Way: Hive to reach Equilibrium on June 30th, 2021" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 104,637,439 |
| net_rshares | 169,794,039,593 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| geneeverett | 0 | 169,794,039,593 | 15% |
I donโt get it. When I vote itโs same value as if I wait 20 minutes or so it seconds after a post is out/. What am I missing?
| author | geneeverett |
|---|---|
| permlink | qvme8i |
| category | hive |
| json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
| created | 2021-07-02 13:45:54 |
| last_update | 2021-07-02 13:45:54 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2021-07-09 13:45:54 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.011 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.011 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 128 |
| author_reputation | 575,433,968,005,380 |
| root_title | "Hive Hardfork 25 is on the Way: Hive to reach Equilibrium on June 30th, 2021" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 104,677,708 |
| net_rshares | 47,803,263,606 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adamcurry33 | 0 | 47,803,263,606 | 100% |
We both joined only a month apart. We both have seen that no matter what timeout was used for initial voting the bots always won. There is fundamental flaw in the way Steem and Hive do the curation and payouts which no timeout will ever fix. People will always flock to the high profile accounts to curate on past performance instead of curating the post at hand. Which makes curation a self fulfilling prophecy.
| author | vermithrax |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-alphacore-qvkjo8 |
| category | hive |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["hive"],"app":"peakd/2021.06.3"} |
| created | 2021-07-01 13:48:09 |
| last_update | 2021-07-01 13:48:09 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2021-07-08 13:48:09 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 414 |
| author_reputation | 5,237,025,582,075 |
| root_title | "Hive Hardfork 25 is on the Way: Hive to reach Equilibrium on June 30th, 2021" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 104,657,109 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks