Viewing a response to: @deathwing/re-pharesim-q7qivf
I agree, vote decay is something i want since years
author | pharesim |
---|---|
permlink | q7r06e |
category | hive |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2020-03-25 12:03:51 |
last_update | 2020-03-25 12:03:51 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2020-04-01 12:03:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 51 |
author_reputation | 239,352,620,843,716 |
root_title | "Adjust your witness votes!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 96,574,740 |
net_rshares | 0 |
After talking with @gandalf today, even if vote decay doesn't become a thing. I definitely advocate for automatic witness disabling, as in; A witness does not produce a block (missing them) for 14 days, does not update the price feed, is on an old version of the chain (HF20-21-22 for us) just, disable the witness. If a witness isn't able to find a solution to these problems in 14 days, 2 weeks, half a month. There is no need for them to be an "active" witness per se. If they, however, fix their issues. They can return on being an active witness. I still think vote decaying is a better option but... this is somewhat a middle-ground.
author | deathwing |
---|---|
permlink | re-pharesim-q7r0cy |
category | hive |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive"],"app":"peakd/2020.03.12"} |
created | 2020-03-25 12:07:48 |
last_update | 2020-03-25 12:07:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-04-01 12:07:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 643 |
author_reputation | 269,077,595,754,009 |
root_title | "Adjust your witness votes!" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 96,574,778 |
net_rshares | 0 |