RE: The DNC is ignoring the Rule of Law (again) and they are making their illegal Investigation totally closed to everyone! by logiczombie

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @smithlabs/pzydgg

informationwar · @logiczombie · Oct 28 '19

It is a crime to use your office to provide income for your Son;

I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

> But most grade school kids would know that this is bad. Maybe they will look it up for you.

Please use FACTS ONLY.

> It is a crime to use your office to provide income for your Son;

I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

> Do you own damn research, since you don't give a flip about the Rule of Law anyway. Or check with the grade school kids again...

Please use FACTS ONLY.

> It is illegal to threaten the withhold US Military aid, knowing full well that the country will be over run by the Russians without that aid.

I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

> It is disappointing that you only agree in principle, as this should be an absolute; even with sheeple, SMH! When something is wrong, that should even include if the infraction is done by a liberal minion; this is NOT conditional.

Please use FACTS ONLY.

> It is illegal to secure loans, based on your father's government job;

I agree in principle, but can you reference the specific law?

> Is there no absolute beyond hate of all Conservatives? You are telling me there are instances where you are fine with securing loans based on your Father's government job. I am stunned that this is acceptably practice for you, but sadly I am not surprised. This allows you to wait until you are given your opinion....

Please use FACTS ONLY.

> then use that money to invest in companies that are sanctioned.

Yes, it is illegal to invest in companies that have been listed as illegal to invest in.

> WOW, an absolute from a liberal! That does surprise me.

Are you suggesting that Zlochevsky and Burisma was under U.S. sanctions at the time that Hunter Biden became involved with them?

> Neither of us knows when this began, but it becomes an illegal act, after the sanctions are imposed, to continue to invest!
> 
> Not to mention this money came from China to buy influence, AND $1,500,000,000.00 is a LOT of influence to accept, even for a liberal minion!
> 
> The fact is that every one of your talking points comes from someone else, This canned "discussion" is BORING! IF you want a liberal echo chamber, you should go to Facebook, not steemit!

Please use FACTS ONLY.

Thanks for spewing ad hominems and unqualified personal opinions.

You've managed to convince me you are incapable of supporting any of your bald assertions with FACTS.

👍 smithlabs

`author`	logiczombie
`permlink`	q033b2
`category`	informationwar
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-10-28 12:23:18
`last_update`	2019-10-28 12:23:18
`depth`	9
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-11-04 12:23:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	2,486
`author_reputation`	41,793,140,992,203
`root_title`	"The DNC is ignoring the Rule of Law (again) and they are making their illegal Investigation totally closed to everyone!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	0
`post_id`	91,979,850
`net_rshares`	6,846,457,017
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
smithlabs	0 B		6,846,457,017	100%

@smithlabs · Oct 29 '19

$0.04

You have proven that you are willing to support anything, by agreeing in principle. This leaves you options open to accept anything you are told. 

Deliberately ignoring the Facts presented, while asking for facts; is a standard dodge used by liberals. So I am not surprised. 

You just decided that the $1,500,000,000.00 "loan" from China to Biden's son is somehow non factual. 

The investments in sanctioned business has continued past the time where those businesses became sanctioned. Somehow, this continued investment is okay with you, as long as they were doing business before the sanctions were imposed. Interesting that this removes the sanctions, entirely; and make trhem of zero use. 

But you ignore facts, so why not ignore sanctions too?

👍 logiczombie

`author`	smithlabs
`permlink`	q047b5
`category`	informationwar
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-10-29 02:37:57
`last_update`	2019-10-29 02:37:57
`depth`	10
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-11-05 02:37:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.021 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.021 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	753
`author_reputation`	125,286,074,974,550
`root_title`	"The DNC is ignoring the Rule of Law (again) and they are making their illegal Investigation totally closed to everyone!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	91,998,494
`net_rshares`	243,898,842,017
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
logiczombie	0 B		243,898,842,017	100%

@logiczombie · Oct 29 '19

> You have proven that you are willing to support anything, by agreeing in principle. This leaves you options open to accept anything you are told.

I have agreed to specific statements you've made.  Please don't leap to ridiculous conclusions.

> Deliberately ignoring the Facts presented, while asking for facts; is a standard dodge used by liberals. So I am not surprised.

I have only ignored the OPINIONS you've conflated with FACTS.

> You just decided that the $1,500,000,000.00 "loan" from China to Biden's son is somehow non factual.

I did no such thing.  I merely pointed out that the MOTIVES you've attributed to the parties involved are your own personal OPINIONS.

> The investments in sanctioned business has continued past the time where those businesses became sanctioned. 

Great.  If what you say is true, then have the STATE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATE.

> Somehow, this continued investment is okay with you, as long as they were doing business before the sanctions were imposed. Interesting that this removes the sanctions, entirely; and make trhem of zero use.

I said no such thing.

> But you ignore facts, so why not ignore sanctions too?

Have fun burning down that STRAW-MAN you just fabricated out of thin air.

properties (22)