RE: Understanding Cognition: Is Q Anon Real? Examining Evidence Through The Lens Of Cognitive Bias by lucyreloaded

`author`	lucyreloaded
`permlink`	re-cryptogee-re-lucyreloaded-re-cryptogee-understanding-cognition-is-q-anon-real-examining-evidence-through-the-lens-of-cognitive-bias-20180920t113256262z
`category`	informationwar
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["informationwar"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-09-20 11:33:03
`last_update`	2018-09-20 11:33:03
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-09-27 11:33:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.087 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.028 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	173
`author_reputation`	2,185,298,352,573
`root_title`	"Understanding Cognition: Is Q Anon Real? Examining Evidence Through The Lens Of Cognitive Bias"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	71,757,987
`net_rshares`	87,487,844,444
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
cryptogee	0 B		87,487,844,444	100%

@cryptogee · Sep 20 '18

>you point being willingly closed because due cognitive bias?

No, my point is that there is nothing authentic on the qanon site. It is full of cryptic utterances and mainstream media quotes.

>occams razor on the whole 9/11 day? really...? wow.

That's the thing with Occam's Razor, it doesn't discriminate regarding informational content. It is a process of logical thought. Hence logic dictates that there are two possibilities regarding 9/11.

a) It was a case of criminal negligence. A person or persons placed in the right place at the right time decided to ignore one of the thousands of threats a day against the United States.

b) Due to the fact that there are thousands of threats each day on the United States, the powers that be simply missed that particular one.

If it is A, somebody should be brought to justice but probably won't be, because ignoring something leaves little or no trace. In other words the perfect conspiracy (few people involved, nothing to do but do nothing).

If it is B then it comes down to management of threat levels. Seeing as there haven't been any major attacks on the US since, I'd say they're doing a pretty good job.

As I said to you when you asked, as regards to a skyscraper collapsing after prolonged fire, it happened again rather recently in Brazil and there are a few other examples, which are there for you to find should you care to look. Which you will if you want to truly know if you're under the influence of confirmation bias. 

If however you believe that you are 100% right, then you simply won't look any further, stopping you from learning anything new. 

Funnily enough that particular cognitive bias is one I'm covering in my next article. Coming soon, watch out for it! 😁

[*Cg*](https://steemit.com/@cryptogee)

properties (22)