I certainly understand where you are coming from, and I get it. It's just that personally I don't trust it, since *man* has to make the AI in the first place. Programs can be tweaked and modified based on the preference of the one creating or supervising it, which I think can be dangerous. If AI judges could be proven to the best method, and everyone agreed, then it would be easy for those in control of them to modify them to work the favor of their personal preferences and beliefs. Once they were allowed and the human judges were taken out of the picture, there really would be no turning back.

Ultimately, "justice" seems to be too relative down here anyway, and it will always be skewed, which is no reason to give up, but most likely will always remain true nonetheless.

At least we can agree to disagree on this one. Thanks for the post and the reply @calaber24p!