Viewing a response to: @abh12345/pypig3
Interesting š¤ No I donāt have a one day on, one day off approach.. I have no approach š but I guess I get busy at work and so Iām more active some days over others. Thanks for the chart! Crazy to see how much that curation went up once I hit a certain SP level, as my voting habits havenāt changed.
| author | justineh |
|---|---|
| permlink | pypiog |
| category | monthlyreport |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-01 17:45:54 |
| last_update | 2019-10-01 17:45:54 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 3 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-08 17:45:54 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 302 |
| author_reputation | 171,050,398,797,557 |
| root_title | "September 2019 - Monthly Steem report via script" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 91,131,078 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
It's good to see some decent numbers from a manual curator :)
| author | abh12345 |
|---|---|
| permlink | pypjj6 |
| category | monthlyreport |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-01 18:04:18 |
| last_update | 2019-10-01 18:04:18 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-08 18:04:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 61 |
| author_reputation | 1,404,456,774,068,825 |
| root_title | "September 2019 - Monthly Steem report via script" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 91,131,659 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
Yes, it still doesnāt compare with auto though.. so if the goal is to form a culture here based on what is incentivized, then that chart would be much higher if I just put an auto on people I know who will be voted. Rather than spend hours curating content and then when I find something amazing, sharing it everywhere and getting it to those who can make it trend. Sure I get great rewards when this happens, as I voted it first.. but I could get what a 150% return if I just autovoted? (Based on the trending post from the newest ācuratorā)... so why would we spend time doing something for less of a return if we can just make more by automating it? Not complaining, just pointing out something that is still a issue imo.
| author | justineh |
|---|---|
| permlink | pypn3s |
| category | monthlyreport |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-01 19:21:30 |
| last_update | 2019-10-01 19:21:30 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-08 19:21:30 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 724 |
| author_reputation | 171,050,398,797,557 |
| root_title | "September 2019 - Monthly Steem report via script" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 91,133,710 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
Yeah, true. Folks should delegate a % to curation initiatives or trail them to ease the guilt, like me :)
| author | abh12345 |
|---|---|
| permlink | pypnnb |
| category | monthlyreport |
| json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2019-10-01 19:33:09 |
| last_update | 2019-10-01 19:33:09 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2019-10-08 19:33:09 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 106 |
| author_reputation | 1,404,456,774,068,825 |
| root_title | "September 2019 - Monthly Steem report via script" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 91,134,031 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks