| json_metadata | "{"app":"Musing","appTags":["steemit","curation"],"appCategory":"steemit","appTitle":"Do you think 100% payout system to author will improve the quality post percentage behavior of Steemians?","appBody":"<p>It might or it might not. As a content creator on Steem I would definitely like to have such an option, but I am aware at the same time that some curators would not be interested anymore in curating and rewards would decrease in value. When that happens there aren't as many incentives as before to keep boosting the quality and strive for the best forcing some of the users to simply become lazy and be satisfied with some auto votes that they have and post some average or under average quality posts. It depends a lot on the users and its curators for the quality to be improved by such a payout formula. If you have generous curators that don't care that much about that Steem Power that they get in return for curating your content then it will be perfectly fine and you would earn more while giving your best to attract even more curators, but if the people upvoting you are expecting something in return then the things will be totally different and lots of them would simply power down and get their Steem out of the wallets and probably invest that money in other cryptocurrency. I don't think though that this 100% payout system will ever be enforced because creators are the most incentivized because they bring a lot of contribution to the traffic on the platform and its value but curators have to be rewarded somehow also. I think that for now the 72/25 payout system is perfectly fine. </p>\n<p>Hope you find my view on the topic interesting and wish you a great day!</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"f32hajelx","appParentAuthor":"zohaib336","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
|---|
hiveblocks