| json_metadata | "{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["Steem"],"appCategory":"Steem","appTitle":"What's your take on fake comment and engagement ?","appBody":"<p>No such thing as a fake comment, there is only a comment that you decide whether it's sincere or not. I think it's the quality of engagement that matters more. Transient praises can be sincere but it's those constant sincere praises that do deserve attention. While it is true that there are incentives to engage with other people, we can't deny that there are people already engaging with other people because they enjoy so, the bonus is just being being complimented back or be upvoted. </p>\n<p>I do think we should consciously make people engage because it's how the platform will grow. There would be exchange of ideas rather than people keeping to themselves and hope to get attention. We are all strangers to one another so actions that support interaction should be promoted because that leads to growth in the blockchain. I'll never be where I am if I just relied on posting my art on the platform. </p>\n<p>Even before being rewarded for engaging with other users, I have learned that in order for people to like you, you have to learn how to like them first. Not just liking them in a shallow manner like what they can do for you. I mean liking them in who they really are. I always try to find something good about the author I'm commenting on beyond their recent post I'm seeing. I think real quality engagement happens when there is an active effort in trying to know the other better and have an exchange of ideas.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"p3jmphwsq","appParentAuthor":"nonsowrites","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
|---|
hiveblocks