<a href="https://musing.io/q/boliboli/fksa8a7hx">View this answer on Musing.io</a><br />

<p>In my candid opinion, fating more than one partner is a toxic lifestyle. Aside from the fact that you might be prone to different forms of STIs or STDs, coping with lying and denial just to maintain both relationships can be extremely stressful and tiring even if you might see yourself as a Casanova, the mind stress would definitely get to you.</p><p>Having more than one partner is not advisable, it opens up the possibility of having different form of stress. Physical stress, mental stress and psychological stress. Physical stress occurs from the fact that you'd want to please both partners in anyway you can just not to give up the truth that you are a double timing Casanova. Sexually satisfying two partners requires a lot of strength which comes at a price, you get worn out always.</p><p>Mental stress on the other hand stems from the fact that lying, maintaining the lie and selling the lie to your partners for them to believe you requires a lot of thinking and strategizing  which can lead you into a dull mental state, aggressive or even moody.</p><p>Furthermore, psychologically, one cannot cope with having to maintain two  relationships at the same time. the stress on the mental state can cause a psychological breakdown of such individual.</p><p>Apart from the stress mentioned above, dating more than one partner opens up the  individual to the possibility of contacting STIs or STDs which happens to be a product of having multiple sexual partners.</p><p>There are other negative consequences like physical fatigue, high blood pressure due to excessive stress,  falling sick often etc.</p><p>In a nutshell, it is not advisable to have more than one partner because it's just like sitting on a keg of gunpowder with an alresdy lit matches at hand.</p>

<a href="https://musing.io/q/boliboli/fksa8a7hx">View this answer on Musing.io</a><br />

<p>Usually to see people keep a few connections and keep on overhauling every one of them with sex. To numerous people, that is the best approach to appreciate life. What's more, notwithstanding when the outcomes of such way of life is around us consistently, many are not dissuaded. </p><p>Numerous individuals have treated this subject from a wide range of edges. In any case, I wish to approach it from another point with the expectation that it would help somebody who might have squandered either their chance to wind up someone or their lives. Note that being fortunate isn't sufficient motivation to bet with one's life. </p><p>Here are three noteworthy weaknesses to various dating and additionally resting around. </p><p>Profound. The savvy definitely realizes that each sort of transgression, including sexual sin, isolates one from God and prompts otherworldly, physical and at last interminable passing. That much can't be over underlined. Nonetheless, one region that a large number of us don't consider when we talk about the subject of different connections or sex accomplices is SOUL TIE. </p><p>What is a Soul Tie? A spirit tie is a passionate bond or association that joins you with another person. You can wind up bound to a man through your spirit. </p><p>Have you wound up tormented by musings about a man, exorbitantly pondering about them, keeping an eye on them, practicing times with them? Assuming this is the case, you have soul ties. Have you lamented over a disjoined association with somebody you were once near? Assuming this is the case, you have soul ties. </p><p>Soul Ties can be shaped through a few different ways including Vows, Commitments and Agreements, Close Relationships and Sex. This is the reason it is so regular for a man to in any case have 'sentiments' towards an ex-sweetheart that they have no privilege to be pulled in to in that way. Indeed, even 20 years not far off, a man may in any case think about their first darling... regardless of whether he or she is the nation over and has their own family, all in view of a spirit tie!</p>

<a href="https://musing.io/q/boliboli/fksa8a7hx">View this answer on Musing.io</a>