Viewing a response to: @themanwithnoname/f36bsa2jq
<a href="https://musing.io/q/themanwithnoname/f36bsa2jq">View this answer on Musing.io</a><br />
author | calprut |
---|---|
permlink | f34bfqncw |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | "{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["steem","steemit","sbd","price","rewards"],"appCategory":"steem","appTitle":"\"100% Powered Up\" or \"50/50\" to maximize rewards?","appBody":"<p>100% power up is the best for newbie on the blockchain. Thats make sure they can grow faster.</p>\n<p>But if you already have more power, at least 1,000 SP maybe, you can set 50/50, so you can get some earnings while still maintaining your power.</p>\n<p><strong>And,,, for the rewards, it's already pegged, so the result will be the same.</strong></p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"f36bsa2jq","appParentAuthor":"themanwithnoname","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
created | 2018-12-22 07:26:24 |
last_update | 2018-12-22 07:27:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-12-29 07:26:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 96 |
author_reputation | 70,348,854,373,895 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 77,210,301 |
net_rshares | 4,304,114,299 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
igram | 0 | 120,435,003 | 2.66% | ||
reazuliqbal | 0 | 3,290,168,906 | 3% | ||
mixr | 0 | 479,684,080 | 5% | ||
mariita52 | 0 | 413,826,310 | 100% |
<p>Thanks for your response. </p><p>The rewards algorithm is more complicated than just how a person wants their rewards. Previously, Steem's internal systems always assumed that the price of SBD was at $1.00 because it's supposed to be a stable coin, and therefore always at $1.00... or at least $1.00 of Steem. So whenever the price of SBD was lower than $1.00, you got more rewards by posting 100% powered up. And when the price of SBD went over $1, you got more rewards by posting 50/50, because even though the half that got paid in SBD was based on the price of SBD being at $1, it was actually higher. </p><p>Things have changed, so I'm just trying to find the new way to maximize rewards. Though your answer wasn't what I was looking for, I appreciate your attempt. </p>
author | themanwithnoname |
---|---|
permlink | fkczxxwzq |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | "{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["steem","steemit","sbd","price","rewards"],"appCategory":"steem","appBody":"<p>Thanks for your response. </p><p>The rewards algorithm is more complicated than just how a person wants their rewards. Previously, Steem's internal systems always assumed that the price of SBD was at $1.00 because it's supposed to be a stable coin, and therefore always at $1.00... or at least $1.00 of Steem. So whenever the price of SBD was lower than $1.00, you got more rewards by posting 100% powered up. And when the price of SBD went over $1, you got more rewards by posting 50/50, because even though the half that got paid in SBD was based on the price of SBD being at $1, it was actually higher. </p><p>Things have changed, so I'm just trying to find the new way to maximize rewards. Though your answer wasn't what I was looking for, I appreciate your attempt. </p>","appDepth":3,"appParentPermlink":"f34bfqncw","appParentAuthor":"calprut","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"comment"}" |
created | 2018-12-26 19:20:51 |
last_update | 2018-12-26 19:20:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-01-02 19:20:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 778 |
author_reputation | 27,720,428,062,795 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 77,419,353 |
net_rshares | 0 |
<p>Thanks for your response. </p><p>The rewards algorithm is more complicated than just how a person wants their rewards. Previously, Steem's internal systems always assumed that the price of SBD was at $1.00 because it's supposed to be a stable coin, and therefore always at $1.00... or at least $1.00 of Steem. So whenever the price of SBD was lower than $1.00, you got more rewards by posting 100% powered up. And when the price of SBD went over $1, you got more rewards by posting 50/50, because even though the half that got paid in SBD was based on the price of SBD being at $1, it was actually higher. </p><p>Things have changed, so I'm just trying to find the new way to maximize rewards. Though your answer wasn't what I was looking for, I appreciate your attempt. </p>
author | themanwithnoname |
---|---|
permlink | pkjes5qyq |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | "{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["steem","steemit","sbd","price","rewards"],"appCategory":"steem","appBody":"<p>Thanks for your response. </p><p>The rewards algorithm is more complicated than just how a person wants their rewards. Previously, Steem's internal systems always assumed that the price of SBD was at $1.00 because it's supposed to be a stable coin, and therefore always at $1.00... or at least $1.00 of Steem. So whenever the price of SBD was lower than $1.00, you got more rewards by posting 100% powered up. And when the price of SBD went over $1, you got more rewards by posting 50/50, because even though the half that got paid in SBD was based on the price of SBD being at $1, it was actually higher. </p><p>Things have changed, so I'm just trying to find the new way to maximize rewards. Though your answer wasn't what I was looking for, I appreciate your attempt. </p>","appDepth":3,"appParentPermlink":"f34bfqncw","appParentAuthor":"calprut","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"comment"}" |
created | 2018-12-26 19:20:33 |
last_update | 2018-12-26 19:20:33 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-01-02 19:20:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 778 |
author_reputation | 27,720,428,062,795 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 77,419,339 |
net_rshares | 0 |