Viewing a response to: @musing-threads/a9976gync
<a href="https://musing.io/q/elyon/fk5uqeb7x"><b>View this question on Musing.io</b></a>
author | elyon |
---|---|
permlink | fk5uqeb7x |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | {"app":"Musing","appTags":["health","wealth","sex"],"appCategory":"health","appBody":"","appDepth":1,"musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"question"} |
created | 2018-10-07 02:57:03 |
last_update | 2018-10-07 02:57:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-10-14 02:57:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.188 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.062 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 88 |
author_reputation | 18,257,507,121,080 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 72,778,577 |
net_rshares | 162,024,906,442 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
musing | 0 | 162,024,906,442 | 1% |
<p>This is such a great question, I had to do a lot today thinking before I could answer this. It dawned on me that despite the fact that the reproductive health of both sexes are important, that of the woman is much more important that of the men and I'll explain why;</p><p>1. Limited time of fertility: Women Oly have about 50 years before they hit menopause and 10-15 years before that, they'll already be infertile or at least their bodies will already be running low on eggs to ovulate. Ensuring that their reproductive health is optimal through out this process trumps that of the man seeing as he remains relatively fertile till the day he dies. A woman's fertility is like a count down timer and once it's done, so is the woman's chances of ever having a kid.</p><p>2. Limited amount of eggs: It seems that women are plagued by a number of limitations in the department of reproduction. Women have a limited amount of eggs from birth and they start off at about 2 million eggs but by the time of puberty only about 300,000 are left. Out of that 300,000 only 300-400 will successfully be ovulated, this with every passing menstrual cycle, women get closer and closer to infertility. Men continue to produce sperm till the day they die but women stop producing eggs midway through their lives.</p><p>3. Child bearer: This is perhaps the most significant reason why female reproductive health is more important than that of men. Yes men have an important role to play in the fertilisation of the egg that produces the baby, but after that it's all up to the woman. It's her body that's going to carry the baby for 9 months and if there's something wrong with her reproductive system then there's a good chance that there's going to be something wrong with the child. A woman's reproductive health is tied directly to the overall growth and development of the child, whatever she's facing or whatever problem she has will also be the baby's problem.</p><p>Both sexes reproductive health are important, because in an ideal sense, both sexes have to come together for a baby to be made, but only one of the sexes is required for the growth and development of the child through the gestation period, and that's the woman. Her reproductive health is by far more important than that of the man.</p><p>I hope this helps.</p>
author | francistagbo |
---|---|
permlink | p3uc3kh75 |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | "{"app":"Musing","appTags":["health","wealth","sex"],"appCategory":"health","appBody":"<p>This is such a great question, I had to do a lot today thinking before I could answer this. It dawned on me that despite the fact that the reproductive health of both sexes are important, that of the woman is much more important that of the men and I'll explain why;</p><p>1. Limited time of fertility: Women Oly have about 50 years before they hit menopause and 10-15 years before that, they'll already be infertile or at least their bodies will already be running low on eggs to ovulate. Ensuring that their reproductive health is optimal through out this process trumps that of the man seeing as he remains relatively fertile till the day he dies. A woman's fertility is like a count down timer and once it's done, so is the woman's chances of ever having a kid.</p><p>2. Limited amount of eggs: It seems that women are plagued by a number of limitations in the department of reproduction. Women have a limited amount of eggs from birth and they start off at about 2 million eggs but by the time of puberty only about 300,000 are left. Out of that 300,000 only 300-400 will successfully be ovulated, this with every passing menstrual cycle, women get closer and closer to infertility. Men continue to produce sperm till the day they die but women stop producing eggs midway through their lives.</p><p>3. Child bearer: This is perhaps the most significant reason why female reproductive health is more important than that of men. Yes men have an important role to play in the fertilisation of the egg that produces the baby, but after that it's all up to the woman. It's her body that's going to carry the baby for 9 months and if there's something wrong with her reproductive system then there's a good chance that there's going to be something wrong with the child. A woman's reproductive health is tied directly to the overall growth and development of the child, whatever she's facing or whatever problem she has will also be the baby's problem.</p><p>Both sexes reproductive health are important, because in an ideal sense, both sexes have to come together for a baby to be made, but only one of the sexes is required for the growth and development of the child through the gestation period, and that's the woman. Her reproductive health is by far more important than that of the man.</p><p>I hope this helps.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"fk5uqeb7x","appParentAuthor":"elyon","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
created | 2018-10-07 04:50:21 |
last_update | 2018-10-07 04:50:21 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-10-14 04:50:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 3.800 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 1.265 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 2,323 |
author_reputation | 24,382,918,426,596 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 72,782,629 |
net_rshares | 3,271,552,187,213 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
christian94 | 0 | 752,282,060 | 100% | ||
musing | 0 | 3,270,799,905,153 | 20% |
<a href="https://musing.io/q/elyon/fk5uqeb7x">View this answer on Musing.io</a><br />
author | hellshark |
---|---|
permlink | p3tku4b75 |
category | musing-threads |
json_metadata | "{"app":"Musing","appTags":["health","wealth","sex"],"appCategory":"health","appBody":"<p>Hi friend</p>\n<p>The countries with medium and low incomes are the most affected by climate change, and women constitute one of the most vulnerable populations. Women are often responsible for collecting water and firewood, which are increasingly scarce due to climate change. Moreover, there are two hundred and fifteen million women around the world who have an unmet need for contraception. In some regions, young women between the ages of 15 and 19 are twice as likely to lack access to contraceptive methods as women who are over 20 years old. The ability of a community to respond to climate change can improve if women gain access to information about sexual and reproductive health services to plan their families.</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>But access to sexual and reproductive health services, including contraception, could be seriously hampered by the damaging effects of climate change, which would limit the options for women and young people to plan their families and, in addition, make it difficult capacity of communities to mitigate and respond to climate change.</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>Experts have also found that the protection of young people's sexual and reproductive health and rights is cost-effective. Based on recent data on emissions and the effectiveness and cost of programs, climate change economists have come to the conclusion that responding to the unmet need for contraceptive methods and providing educational support to young women is much more economical than the development of low carbon emission options, including the development of solar, wind or nuclear generation, of second generation biofuels, or of carbon capture and storage. It was found that family planning programs and girls' education were cost-competitive with forest conservation and other improvements in agricultural and forestry practices.</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>Finally, in addition to being cost-effective and an imperative for human rights, investing women with the power to plan their pregnancies would significantly reduce carbon emissions. This step in itself would provide 8 to 15 percent of the reductions needed to avoid the climate change.</p>\n<p><br></p>\n<p>The movements of sexual and reproductive health and rights and of climate change must recognize their interconnection and join efforts to help mitigate climate change and ensure women's access to their sexual and reproductive health rights.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"fk5uqeb7x","appParentAuthor":"elyon","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
created | 2018-10-07 03:07:39 |
last_update | 2018-10-07 03:07:39 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-10-14 03:07:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 85 |
author_reputation | 825,494,079,389 |
root_title | "Musing Posts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 72,778,962 |
net_rshares | 0 |