| json_metadata | "{"app":"Musing","appTags":["energy"],"appCategory":"energy","appTitle":"What energy is cheaper to produce, nuclear or wind?","appBody":"<p>The short answer is No, it isn't. I discovered that atomic is 275% more exorbitant per kilowatt than wind and 150% more than sun based. This is because of the expense of development with the normal expense of 14-16 billion to build an atomic plant. Likewise not at all like sun based and twist, there have been no new advancements or advances to drive down the expense. </p>\n<p>Rather than contrasting atomic with wind you should contrast it with coal and flammable gas. Wind and sun oriented don't give you a base power creation, that is if the sun doesn't sparkle and the breeze doesn't blow you don't get control. With coal and atomic you can create an assent supply of intensity. Contrasted with coal atomic is still more costly, in any case, a carbon expense of $25-$50 per metric ton would make atomic more financial than coal.</p>\n<p>Thanks for asking that interesting question i hope you get it.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"pkgv4tc2x","appParentAuthor":"muzaidi","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
|---|
hiveblocks