create account

Question answered on Musing.io by glenalbrethsen

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @groynes/f3wwaydhq

· @glenalbrethsen · (edited)
$0.79
Question answered on Musing.io
I think as long as the value of STEEM is low, resource credits are keeping spam lower than it was. It takes some established spam farms, with some RCs spread out among each account, to effectively get off the ground. Most can't survive.

However, that's not to say spam is completely gone, but it is much better, in my opinion then it was before.

However, as some are noting, it has done so at the cost of the new user, who doesn't immediately find a way through delegations, investing or otherwise powering up to raise the effective level of RCs. So, it's been a double edged sword, and at a cost to actual legit accounts.

What will be interesting to see is, how quickly the activity in dormant spam accounts where the SP delegation has yet to be removed will return as the price of STEEM rises. It will also be interesting to see how quickly Steemit Inc acts in their removal of delegations to said accounts after they revive.

The fact that Steemit has decided to remove the delegations from proven spammers, scammers and plagiarists is actually a step in a more effective direction, and will probably be the cause of reducing spam on the blockchain, even if it means those spammers will continue to find ways to open new accounts.

It would be nice if we could move to some form of Know Your Customer/Client so alt accounts could be immediately traced to the main account. I don't know how that would work without some folks feeling their privacy was being invaded, but I've yet to figure out what good someone will actually do for the blockchain by opening up hundreds of alt accounts. I know what they hope to do. I don't know how it really helps others.

it would be nice to get to a point where we can actually identify legit users vs. bots or alt accounts meant to form some flavor of farm. It would also be nice to then be able to up the RCs to the legit users so they can function until they have enough on their own. By knocking down spam, we've effectively cut off the new users ability to do anything, and since they can't really do anything, they can't really complain about it effectively, so then most people think everything is just fine when there's a growing, ongoing issue that will need to be resolved at some point, rather than being oblivious to it or ignoring it.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorglenalbrethsen
permlinkp36ag5l7q
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata"{"app":"steemit/0.1","appTags":["Steem","steemit"],"appCategory":"Steem","appTitle":"How effective resource credit is in keeping spam in check in steem ecosystem?","appBody":"<p>I think as long as the value of STEEM is low, resource credits are keeping spam lower than it was. It takes some established spam farms, with some RCs spread out among each account, to effectively get off the ground. Most can't survive.</p>\n<p>However, that's not to say spam is completely gone, but it is much better, in my opinion then it was before.</p>\n<p>However, as some are noting, it has done so at the cost of the new user, who doesn't immediately find a way through delegations, investing or otherwise powering up to raise the effective level of RCs. So, it's been a double edged sword, and at a cost to actual legit accounts.</p>\n<p>What will be interesting to see is, how quickly the activity in dormant spam accounts where the SP delegation has yet to be removed will return as the price of STEEM rises. It will also be interesting to see how quickly Steemit Inc acts in their removal of delegations to said accounts after they revive.</p>\n<p>The fact that Steemit has decided to remove the delegations from proven spammers, scammers and plagiarists is actually a step in a more effective direction, and will probably be the cause of reducing spam on the blockchain, even if it means those spammers will continue to find ways to open new accounts.</p>\n<p>It would be nice if we could move to some form of Know Your Customer/Client so alt accounts could be immediately traced to the main account. I don't know how that would work without some folks feeling their privacy was being invaded, but I've yet to figure out what good someone will actually do for the blockchain by opening up hundreds of alt accounts. I know what they hope to do. I don't know how it really helps others.</p>\n<p>it would be nice to get to a point where we can actually identify legit users vs. bots or alt accounts meant to form some flavor of farm. It would also be nice to then be able to up the RCs to the legit users so they can function until they have enough on their own. By knocking down spam, we've effectively cut off the new users ability to do anything, and since they can't really do anything, they can't really complain about it effectively, so then most people think everything is just fine when there's a growing, ongoing issue that will need to be resolved at some point, rather than being oblivious to it or ignoring it.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"f3wwaydhq","appParentAuthor":"groynes","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer","tags":["musing-threads"]}"
created2019-04-21 02:42:51
last_update2019-04-21 02:43:57
depth2
children4
last_payout2019-04-28 02:42:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.594 HBD
curator_payout_value0.196 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,290
author_reputation123,853,032,378,097
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id83,475,934
net_rshares1,552,491,217,169
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@artgirl · (edited)
$0.02
Off topic: 
Oh I see so that's how you do the musing answers. So the link to the musing answer should be removed too? Or can I just leave it in and it still won't be considered as a duplicate?
👍  
properties (23)
authorartgirl
permlinkre-glenalbrethsen-p36ag5l7q-20190423t041108969z
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata{"tags":["musing-threads"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-04-23 04:11:12
last_update2019-04-23 04:12:33
depth3
children3
last_payout2019-04-30 04:11:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length192
author_reputation78,679,720,592,344
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id83,592,651
net_rshares42,539,453,381
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@glenalbrethsen ·
$0.02
Hey, @artgirl.

I don't know how @abh12345 will treat the link. A while back when other apps like partiko started leaving their little "using partiko" blurbs that he adjusted the character length count for it. I'm not sure how that's happening now.

I've been removing it simply because no one's going to go to musing to read my comment if they're already reading it on Steemit, and since I didn't write the link, it's not really my CL.

So, I don't know if there's a right or wrong way here. Maybe Asher will provide a preference. Otherwise, I say, do what you feel best. That's what I've been doing. :)

Either way, somehow it's not being counted as a duplicate when Asher goes to pull the list. I've been keeping track of total comments for a long time, and most weeks, we're either dead on, or within a couple of comments of each other.

I think because the answer written on Musing generates a comment, but only as a link on STEEM, it doesn't duplicate even though you're copying and pasting the words from your answer on Musing. So, as long as you don't create a new comment, there won't be a duplicate, even if the link is left.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorglenalbrethsen
permlinkre-artgirl-re-glenalbrethsen-p36ag5l7q-20190423t042114570z
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata{"tags":["musing-threads"],"users":["artgirl","abh12345"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-04-23 04:21:15
last_update2019-04-23 04:21:15
depth4
children2
last_payout2019-04-30 04:21:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.018 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,135
author_reputation123,853,032,378,097
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id83,593,081
net_rshares50,327,196,480
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@abh12345 ·
$0.02
Yeah the Musing approach is good, you need to be rewarded for those comments!

A link/URL not relating to Partiko and a few others that choose to add their link on every reply will not be excluded in the CL count.  So if you ever fancy bumping up your total... :)
👍  
properties (23)
authorabh12345
permlinkre-glenalbrethsen-re-artgirl-re-glenalbrethsen-p36ag5l7q-20190423t100519427z
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata{"tags":["musing-threads"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-04-23 10:05:24
last_update2019-04-23 10:05:24
depth5
children0
last_payout2019-04-30 10:05:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length263
author_reputation1,408,615,966,842,648
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id83,607,026
net_rshares44,803,221,602
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@artgirl ·
Oh I see. Alright. Thanks. 😊

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/artgirl)
properties (22)
authorartgirl
permlinkartgirl-re-glenalbrethsen-re-artgirl-re-glenalbrethsen-p36ag5l7q-20190423t043938043z
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"android"}
created2019-04-23 04:39:39
last_update2019-04-23 04:39:39
depth5
children0
last_payout2019-04-30 04:39:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length98
author_reputation78,679,720,592,344
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id83,593,726
net_rshares0