create account

Are Traditional Rullers (Monarchy) still relevant in this modern world; Would you want your King Dethroned? by josediccus

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @alaisguineasis/fkmq7kaaq

· @josediccus · (edited)
$1.12
Are Traditional Rullers (Monarchy) still relevant in this modern world; Would you want your King Dethroned?
<a href="https://musing.io/q/alaisguineasis/fkmq7kaaq">View this answer on Musing.io</a><br />
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorjosediccus
permlinkf3zu47xsq
categorymusing-threads
json_metadata"{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["Monarchy","Civilization"],"appCategory":"Monarchy","appTitle":"Are Traditional Rullers (Monarchy) still relevant in this modern world; Would you want your King Dethroned?","appBody":"<p>Monarchy is related to feudalism and it is an old system of government that should have been abolished with the likes of communalism, socialism and communism <em><strong>although in some cultures like African culture monarchy represents the maintenance of customs and tradition of ancient people and that is why I think it hasn't been abolished</strong></em>. If you take a look at Nigeria you will discover that there are so many kings, emir and caliphate and they are still practicing democracy as a system of government while maintaining their old practices of monarchy before the British colonial era, so the only reason why I think the monarchy is still in position in so many country is because it represents the custom and tradition of that country and there is always a sentiment in abolishing custom and tradition and that is why it still stand today.</p>\n<p><em><strong>The truth is that they hardly have any relevance because they do not contribute to how the country is being ruled how the national budgets are being solved neither are they part of the legislature all the judiciary </strong></em>but the only representation which there is symbol of is only to maintain custom and tradition like for example<strong> I believe the British are practicing monarchy which is their historic tradition but inside of this practice you could still see that the British have a parliamentary system of government and that the monarchial system of government is only a ceremonious tradition that is why the queen of england is only a ceremonious ruler and the prime minister is actually the head of state controlling the affairs of government</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>So the truth is that they do not have relevance in this modern world but I do not think they should be dethroned the reason why they shouldn't be dethroned is they serve as historic representation and the fact that they are not doing any harm to the current system of government </strong>is the reason why I think they should stay. If you look at most countries of the world you will hardly see monarchy without a mixture of another system of government</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"fkmq7kaaq","appParentAuthor":"alaisguineasis","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}"
created2019-01-07 13:07:06
last_update2019-01-07 13:09:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2019-01-14 13:07:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.865 HBD
curator_payout_value0.251 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length94
author_reputation2,605,011,428,096,936
root_title"Musing Posts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id78,016,524
net_rshares2,152,622,110,482
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)