| json_metadata | "{"app":"musing/1.1","appTags":["life","politics"],"appCategory":"life","appTitle":"What do you think about the Russia’s latest hypersonic rocket Avangarde?","appBody":"<p>I. There is an empirical rule of current media hygiene - Information from Russian state structures or Russian state-controlled media must be considered false (fully or partially) in 90 +% of cases.</p>\n<p>II. This is the case, at least partially. The word \"hypersonic\" is used incorrectly. \"Avangard\" is a theme that has been in use since the 1960s. It is a ballistic head capable of maneuvering (they are all \"hypersonic\" by determination, but nothing to do with true hypersonic technology). This is not bad provided the technology is really ready, which seems not to be the case. In addition it is a head for the ballistic missile \"Sarmat\" which is not ready despite the official announcements, and this only concerns the final phase of trajectory while the components of the US missile shield. aim at the intermediate phases. In the case of \"Kinjal\" it is also the misuse of the term \"hypersonic\", but here no knowledge of the details.</p>\n<p>III. We must emphasize a nuance. In recent years, Putin and other members of the Russian government have been making announcements about new types of weapons of mass destruction (usually unfounded). It became a very common topic in the Russian media, 40% of the time of Putin's last speech in parliament was devoted to these weapons and the army in general (obviously with huge hiccups), all in the situation when no one is threatening Russia with a massive nuclear attack. It sounds like a hysterical reaction to the inner and outer problems that are fast approaching. One can make parallels with a certain person who dreamed of wunderwaffe in 1945.</p>","appDepth":2,"appParentPermlink":"fk8c4umyq","appParentAuthor":"ohmygoodness","musingAppId":"aU2p3C3a8N","musingAppVersion":"1.1","musingPostType":"answer"}" |
|---|
hiveblocks