<p>I'm against it. There is a reason why it's called a domestic league. Domestic league should be be plus in the county where the league is domiciled. </p><p>I wasn't pleased the least bit when I heard about this news. Tebaz was saying it will bring popularity to the league. Does it mean that the league is isn't already popular? A league that, for more than a decade - had the two best footballers on the planet still needs popularity? </p><p>I'm thinking there's more to this than Tebaz is willing to admit. </p><p>I like what Perez said during the last meeting to discuss this issue. He blatantly refused saying that his Real Madrid side weren't going to player any match outside of Spain. Tebaz tried to play with himself emotions by reminding him that it was the same company that organises Real Madrid tours of the US but I don't think Perez would perturbed. </p><p>What would happen to those who have already bought the lot of the season's ticket? Would the clubs now have to arrange flight's for them? Or would they be better to forced to go back home to watch the matches? </p><p>Also, sincerely it's not only high-profile matches that would be taken abroad, what about those of the others? Is that not creating a bias? </p><p>I've tried to look at the situation on many sides and it still doesn't make sense. It will only help the bigger teams get bigger. The only small teams that will benefit are those which would be fortunate to be playing against these big whips in those selected matches. </p><p>The whole idea would kill the concept of 'domestic' leagues. Domestic means at home, close home. Taking La Liga matches abroad would be to defeat the purpose of the league in the first place. </p><p>It would even also hurt the domestic leagues in the US. The MLS would struggle for local spectators and supporters. Let domestic league games be played in at home. </p>