Viewing a response to: @geekgirl/pteugs
Yeah, I think so too. Seems like a counter-intuitive package. >*We're going to increase incentives/rewards for curation. But we're also going to reduce the entire pool of content rewards.* If that's the case, then curation ought to be moved to a larger percentage of the content distribution, like 60/40 or more. That's something that I would approve.
author | ats-david |
---|---|
permlink | ptev42 |
category | normietalk |
json_metadata | {"tags":["normietalk"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-06-20 18:52:51 |
last_update | 2019-06-20 18:52:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-06-27 18:52:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.034 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.011 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 354 |
author_reputation | 324,017,334,201,433 |
root_title | "Normie Talk - HF21 Explained (SPS + EIP) What it is and what happens next" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 86,992,638 |
net_rshares | 81,704,821,132 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
geekgirl | 0 | 81,704,821,132 | 50% |