create account

RE: An update and some words on OCD+OCDB activities by gduran

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @acidyo/an-update-and-some-words-on-ocd-ocdb-activities

· @gduran ·
Actually I do not agree with your project, if the idea behind HF21 (well it depends on who you talk to to start even thinking what the idea behind it was) but one of the main ideas was to increase manual curation, unfortunately OCDB does nothing like that what we have is a few people deciding where a large amount of delegated SP should go, I believe this should be each SP owners choice. I am against downvoting but if you individually believe something should be downvoted again that is your decision go for it, but don't take a whole trail along for the down vote let each decide what he likes or not. As for reward values this is a very touchy space just two or three days ago I posted an article with some original photos of a lot of birds quite nice I think, someone else posted a bunch of photos of a lot of rocks also nice, my birds got about 0.40 the rocks about $35.00, let's face it both were shit posts they should have earned about the same maybe $0.40 was about right, yet one of them was upvoted by some of you big guys (I am not really sure if you or OCDB upvoted those rocks). Is this where you get the idea that things are getting better?
properties (22)
authorgduran
permlinkq10ut0
categoryocd
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-11-15 17:48:42
last_update2019-11-15 17:48:42
depth1
children2
last_payout2019-11-22 17:48:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,157
author_reputation59,303,906,609,934
root_title"An update and some words on OCD+OCDB activities"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id92,530,576
net_rshares0
@acidyo ·
If you don't like downvoters trailing other downvoters you should also not like upvoters trailing other upvoters, in both cases nothing you can do about it. The amount of votes never mattered, the strength did.

Yup, shitposts and their rewards are subjective and can fluctuate quite a lot.
properties (22)
authoracidyo
permlinkq10v52
categoryocd
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-11-15 17:55:51
last_update2019-11-15 17:55:51
depth2
children1
last_payout2019-11-22 17:55:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length290
author_reputation3,386,930,310,297,481
root_title"An update and some words on OCD+OCDB activities"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id92,530,763
net_rshares0
@gduran ·
I don't like either one, curation should be manual and based on merit or let's just cut the hypocrisy about voting for quality posts which are mighty few on Steemit, by the way most of the trending posts are low quality put there by autovotes and are not downvoted, doesn't sound like something that is working OK.
👍  
properties (23)
authorgduran
permlinkq10zih
categoryocd
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-11-15 19:30:24
last_update2019-11-15 19:30:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2019-11-22 19:30:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length314
author_reputation59,303,906,609,934
root_title"An update and some words on OCD+OCDB activities"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id92,532,777
net_rshares67,136,574,983
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)