create account

RE: POB Part 4: Graphene vs Condenser + Databases by jrcornel

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @edicted/pob-part-4-graphene-vs-condenser-databases

· @jrcornel ·
Lot of good stuff in here. I hadn't realized how big of an issue this could become for HIVE... how do we fix it?
properties (22)
authorjrcornel
permlinkqbqov9
categorypob
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2020-06-11 02:13:48
last_update2020-06-11 02:13:48
depth1
children11
last_payout2020-06-18 02:13:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length112
author_reputation2,133,450,396,741,846
root_title"POB Part 4: Graphene vs Condenser + Databases"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id97,893,134
net_rshares0
@edicted ·
Honestly I don't think the problem is going to get fixed preemptively, I think it's going to get fixed reactively. Essentially somewhere along the line Hive scaling is going to fail spectacularly.  It will be at this point that all the devs will wonder what went wrong and try to fix it, and Condenser combined with our extremely inefficient API will be pointed out to the entire network as the root cause.  

I like databases, but most people find database work boring, so they want to work on more exciting projects.  Combine that with the fact that no one wants to work without getting paid, and Condenser development will remain stagnant until it is deemed to be a high priority issue due to systemic failure.  

Hopefully it doesn't come to that and we get some more devs who enjoy database work, but I'm not going to hold my breath on that front.  In the words of Andreas Antonopoulos, our success will be measured in our ability to fail to scale gracefully over time, just like the Internet itself.  

👍  
properties (23)
authoredicted
permlinkre-jrcornel-qbqpp0
categorypob
json_metadata{"tags":["pob"],"app":"peakd/2020.05.5"}
created2020-06-11 02:31:48
last_update2020-06-11 02:31:48
depth2
children10
last_payout2020-06-18 02:31:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,009
author_reputation3,519,670,819,751,059
root_title"POB Part 4: Graphene vs Condenser + Databases"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id97,893,263
net_rshares22,431,118,403
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jrcornel ·
Interesting thoughts. Perhaps you can help get this noticed before it becomes our achilles heel...

On another and mostly unrelated note... 

I know how you like controversial topics :) How do you feel about the present  DAO payouts at the current time in our project life cycle?
properties (22)
authorjrcornel
permlinkqbqq54
categorypob
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2020-06-11 02:41:21
last_update2020-06-11 02:41:21
depth3
children9
last_payout2020-06-18 02:41:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length279
author_reputation2,133,450,396,741,846
root_title"POB Part 4: Graphene vs Condenser + Databases"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id97,893,376
net_rshares0
@edicted · (edited)
$0.05
The proposal payouts?  They are fine for now.  Personally I was against the SPS but I'm glad we have it now that Steemit Inc is gone. @justineh triggered a lot of people asking for $500 a day for 2 months.  I think if she had asked for $100 a day for 10 months no one would have questioned it. 

People just kinda assume we got a bunch of exchange listings for free without anyone putting in the legwork, and then they just want to run around judging the ones who did all the work because they asked for compensation?  I call bullshit. The network has spoken; she gets the money (as predicted).  End of story. 

I'm still against curation and the convergent linear curve, but I think the Decentralized Hive Fund is going to end up paying for itself many time over.  I think the value and incentive generated there will increase the market cap of Hive, and that same increased market cap will generate even more HBD for the dev fund, creating a snowball effect that could launch us to the moon and beyond. 

Bitching about $100-$500 a day here or there is incredibly small-minded.  How many HBD would we be creating a day if we had a trillion dollar market cap?  That's where my head is at.   

Also, many fail to realize that devs are EXPENSIVE.  Bottom-of-the-barrel entry-level untrained devs can get a base salary of $80k a year.  Blockchain devs are even more coveted at like $140k a year.  A blockchain dev with extensive experience in the tech you're using is easily worth $500k a year.   That's $1900 a DAY.  If I could get Dan to work for me I'd pay him $1M a year. Something to think about. 
👍  ,
properties (23)
authoredicted
permlinkre-jrcornel-qbqr1k
categorypob
json_metadata{"tags":["pob"],"app":"peakd/2020.05.5"}
created2020-06-11 03:00:57
last_update2020-06-11 03:21:48
depth4
children8
last_payout2020-06-18 03:00:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 HBD
curator_payout_value0.026 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,600
author_reputation3,519,670,819,751,059
root_title"POB Part 4: Graphene vs Condenser + Databases"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id97,893,594
net_rshares199,653,019,182
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)