Viewing a response to: @borislavzlatanov/re-vikisecrets-qxmhzx
An abuser who is legitimately downvoted could use the free upvote to counter the downvote.
author | vikisecrets |
---|---|
permlink | re-borislavzlatanov-qxmlh1 |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"tags":["pob"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.5"} |
created | 2021-08-10 13:29:27 |
last_update | 2021-08-10 13:29:27 |
depth | 3 |
children | 20 |
last_payout | 2021-08-17 13:29:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 90 |
author_reputation | 1,208,031,563,085,130 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 105,440,184 |
net_rshares | 0 |
OK, so if an abuser is legitimately downvoted, does a free upvote help them in some way? Currently, abusers can use a regular upvote to counter downvotes on their posts. How would a free upvote help them? (Remember they can't use both types of upvotes on a post.) Thinking about it a bit, I guess I can see how it could help abusers to harvest more rewards. If they make their own post (let's say it's plagiarized post), they can upvote other posts for curation rewards AND counteract any downvotes on their plagiarized post using the free upvote. So if anyone upvotes their plagiarized post (e.g. they didn't know it was plagiarized), it could be free money for them if they can use the free upvote to counteract any downvotes received for plagiarism. So I guess I can see how it could help them.
author | borislavzlatanov |
---|---|
permlink | re-vikisecrets-qxmt40 |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"tags":["pob"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.5"} |
created | 2021-08-10 16:14:24 |
last_update | 2021-08-10 16:14:24 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2021-08-17 16:14:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.295 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.295 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 798 |
author_reputation | 23,537,778,362,414 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 105,443,361 |
net_rshares | 808,283,884,921 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
vikisecrets | 0 | 153,624,039,433 | 10% | ||
theycallmedan | 0 | 654,659,845,488 | 1% |
That is a good attack vector, but the extent is pretty low. First off, you can't upvote for more than the upvote is worth nor more than your HP. So, this would take a scammer posting others' content, getting high rewards, + being/having access to a large stake. Most scammers don't keep HP powered up, they steal it right away, so their free upvote would be worthless. In the rare scenario where you had a large stakeholder posting other content, they would quickly be found out, curators would stop voting them, and the downvotes would mount up as word got around. We had a similar scenario. Actually, that's what I love about Hive. It seems like we have seen it all; even the most unlikely of events take place.
author | theycallmedan |
---|---|
permlink | qxnq0e |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2021-08-11 04:05:03 |
last_update | 2021-08-11 04:05:03 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2021-08-18 04:05:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.059 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.058 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 715 |
author_reputation | 1,254,058,380,138,691 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 105,453,781 |
net_rshares | 162,111,298,981 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
vikisecrets | 0 | 162,111,298,981 | 10% |
The person who was legitimately downvoted had to have something to downvote in the first place, which would be the self vote. You can't unvote and revote the post twice with the free upvote. So the free upvote does not help the attacker in this case.
author | theycallmedan |
---|---|
permlink | re-vikisecrets-qxngs8 |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"tags":["pob"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.5"} |
created | 2021-08-11 00:45:45 |
last_update | 2021-08-11 00:46:12 |
depth | 4 |
children | 17 |
last_payout | 2021-08-18 00:45:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.058 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.059 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 250 |
author_reputation | 1,254,058,380,138,691 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 105,451,628 |
net_rshares | 162,374,202,525 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
vikisecrets | 0 | 162,374,202,525 | 10% |
You can split your stake into two accounts, post with both, upvote one post with each account, and then use the other account to counter downvotes.
author | smooth |
---|---|
permlink | qxo117 |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2021-08-11 08:03:09 |
last_update | 2021-08-11 08:03:09 |
depth | 5 |
children | 16 |
last_payout | 2021-08-18 08:03:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 1.026 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 1.026 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 147 |
author_reputation | 253,602,537,834,068 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 105,456,444 |
net_rshares | 2,805,061,287,552 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
theycallmedan | 0 | 2,805,061,287,552 | 4% |
Yeah, this is true. If a large abuser split his votes, he would get a free counter effectively for 100% of his vote. That would be too big of an attack vector for what would be gained; upvote abuse is done much more than any other type of abuse.
author | theycallmedan |
---|---|
permlink | qxoqfo |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2021-08-11 17:11:45 |
last_update | 2021-08-11 17:11:45 |
depth | 6 |
children | 14 |
last_payout | 2021-08-18 17:11:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 245 |
author_reputation | 1,254,058,380,138,691 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 105,465,147 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Why does it have to be his stake, what about the DAO?
author | thoughts-in-time |
---|---|
permlink | qxpgwl |
category | pob |
json_metadata | {"app":"hiveblog/0.1"} |
created | 2021-08-12 02:43:42 |
last_update | 2021-08-12 02:43:42 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2021-08-19 02:43:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 53 |
author_reputation | 59,797,459,104,031 |
root_title | "Proof of Brain Theory & Further Optimization" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 105,475,312 |
net_rshares | 0 |