create account

RE: A mathematical explanation how voting third party in 2016 is the only vote that counts by seanmclellan

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @lifeworship/re-seanmclellan-a-mathematical-explanation-how-voting-third-party-in-2016-is-the-only-vote-that-counts-20160921t093451720z

· @seanmclellan ·
Hence the suggestion to vote for "none of the above" if you're against voting, or for "no rulers" as per @lukestokes suggestion.

Having said that, I do understand and respect your viewpoint.

I seemingly should have titled this post "A mathematical explanation how voting *against* both major parties is the only vote that counts" :)
properties (22)
authorseanmclellan
permlinkre-lifeworship-re-seanmclellan-a-mathematical-explanation-how-voting-third-party-in-2016-is-the-only-vote-that-counts-20160921t130030958z
categorypolitics
json_metadata{"tags":["politics"],"users":["lukestokes"]}
created2016-09-21 13:00:30
last_update2016-09-21 13:00:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-10-21 08:17:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length334
author_reputation154,820,029,330
root_title"A mathematical explanation how voting third party in 2016 is the only vote that counts"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,316,468
net_rshares0