Viewing a response to: @lifeworship/re-seanmclellan-a-mathematical-explanation-how-voting-third-party-in-2016-is-the-only-vote-that-counts-20160921t093451720z
Hence the suggestion to vote for "none of the above" if you're against voting, or for "no rulers" as per @lukestokes suggestion. Having said that, I do understand and respect your viewpoint. I seemingly should have titled this post "A mathematical explanation how voting *against* both major parties is the only vote that counts" :)
author | seanmclellan |
---|---|
permlink | re-lifeworship-re-seanmclellan-a-mathematical-explanation-how-voting-third-party-in-2016-is-the-only-vote-that-counts-20160921t130030958z |
category | politics |
json_metadata | {"tags":["politics"],"users":["lukestokes"]} |
created | 2016-09-21 13:00:30 |
last_update | 2016-09-21 13:00:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-10-21 08:17:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 334 |
author_reputation | 154,820,029,330 |
root_title | "A mathematical explanation how voting third party in 2016 is the only vote that counts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,316,468 |
net_rshares | 0 |