RE: Follow-Up Poll: Expanding "Mute" by oldtimer

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/follow-up-poll-expanding-mute

poll · @oldtimer · Jul 30 '19

I think you have many other much more important issues to fix. 
Why you're wasting time with this?
Very unproductive.

👍 quantumdeveloper, kawaiicrush

`author`	oldtimer
`permlink`	pvfvan
`category`	poll
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["poll"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-07-30 05:01:39
`last_update`	2019-07-30 05:01:39
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-08-06 05:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	117
`author_reputation`	467,383,807,808,698
`root_title`	"Follow-Up Poll: Expanding "Mute""
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	88,917,686
`net_rshares`	3,731,716,298
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kawaiicrush	0 B		1,639,783,127	100%
quantumdeveloper	0 B		2,091,933,171	100%

@jarvie · Jul 30 '19

$0.05

No one is presently programming anything for it and even if they get the go ahead it's not very challenging and maybe even a community member submits a pull request for it. So it's not quite fair to consider it waisting time. They're practicing communication BEFORE doing things and i think that's very valuable thing that we should be celebrating.

👍 gtg, edb

`author`	jarvie
`permlink`	re-oldtimer-pvfwa2
`category`	poll
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["poll"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.10"}
`created`	2019-07-30 05:22:54
`last_update`	2019-07-30 05:22:54
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-08-06 05:22:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.040 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.012 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	349
`author_reputation`	388,515,652,617,149
`root_title`	"Follow-Up Poll: Expanding "Mute""
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	88,918,211
`net_rshares`	157,145,455,676
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
gtg	0 B		143,147,202,717	1%
edb	0 B		13,998,252,959	100%

@oldtimer · Jul 30 '19

You're right. It wasn't fair. I'll try again. Maybe their approach is not right. It's more debating than polling. You cant decide for changes on the opinion of ten or twenty people. Community is much bigger.
But I still think that there are many other things to do first.

properties (22)