RE: Incremental Development Anyone? by robertoueti

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @raycoms/incremental-development-anyone

programming · @robertoueti · Dec 12 '18

Totally agree @raycoms,
I think here on steem, we need to delay the SMT and focus the project in create something easy and simply to use, not for us, but for the devs to create new projects, like these ones that we can see nowadays. After they guarantee that, we need to increase step by step, not rushing and trying to show to everyone the amazing new things that they made but with lack of tests.
In my understand, they have that clear now, so it's time to change the actions.
Thanks for sharing!
Cheers!

<sub>Posted using [Steeve](https://www.steeve.app/@steeveapp), an AI-powered Steem interface</sub>

👍 raycoms

`author`	robertoueti
`permlink`	re-raycoms-incremental-development-anyone-20181212t182331207z
`category`	programming
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["programming"],"format":"markdown","app":"steeve/0.1"}
`created`	2018-12-12 18:23:30
`last_update`	2018-12-12 18:23:30
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-12-19 18:23:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	606
`author_reputation`	54,030,753,776,533
`root_title`	"Incremental Development Anyone?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	76,748,537
`net_rshares`	6,745,652,206
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
raycoms	0 B		6,745,652,206	100%

@raycoms · Dec 12 '18

I think a very limited version of SMTs would be a very good beginning to go with. I wouldn't scrap them completely. But I also think that reducing the costs of full nodes should be prio #1 since that's one of the main bottlenecks for steemit inc and for developers

👍 robertoueti

`author`	raycoms
`permlink`	re-robertoueti-re-raycoms-incremental-development-anyone-20181212t183606894z
`category`	programming
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["programming"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-12-12 18:36:12
`last_update`	2018-12-12 18:36:12
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-12-19 18:36:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	264
`author_reputation`	115,046,969,395,583
`root_title`	"Incremental Development Anyone?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	76,749,064
`net_rshares`	5,782,695,171
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
robertoueti	0 B		5,782,695,171	25%

@robertoueti · Dec 12 '18

For sure.
If the development is advanced, deliver a small version, or even a alpha, could be enough. But totalmente agree that the main concern should be the reduce of the costs.
Thanks for sharing.
Cheers!

properties (22)