Viewing a response to: @mctiller/thoughts-on-the-new-reputation-feature-you-have-a-reputation-with-or-without-a-number
I'm new to this, but that's how it appears to work. I believe it's a way to cull the bot problem. When posts are spam voted or content is plagiarized, it shouldn't be rewarded. If that's the case, it seems like it will be a good system.
author | augere |
---|---|
permlink | re-mctiller-thoughts-on-the-new-reputation-feature-you-have-a-reputation-with-or-without-a-number-20160804t011914531z |
category | reputation |
json_metadata | {"tags":["reputation"]} |
created | 2016-08-04 01:19:03 |
last_update | 2016-08-04 01:19:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-03 14:04:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.052 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.016 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 236 |
author_reputation | 5,159,411,513 |
root_title | "Thoughts on the New Reputation Feature--You have a reputation with or without a number." |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 593,015 |
net_rshares | 78,378,593,910 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mctiller | 0 | 78,378,593,910 | 100% |