RE: One change to make science more open? by dexterdev

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dhimmel/one-change-to-make-science-more-open

science · @dexterdev · Oct 25 '18

$0.39

> Publishing in a high impact journal is not, in and of itself, a contribution to science at all. Studies should not be judged by the journal which published them, but rather a verifiable record (beyond just citations) that the outputs of that study are driving the next generation of research.

Exactly.

👍 dhimmel

`author`	dexterdev
`permlink`	re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t190356810z
`category`	science
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-10-25 19:06:36
`last_update`	2018-10-25 19:06:36
`depth`	1
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2018-11-01 19:06:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.365 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.025 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	304
`author_reputation`	17,771,704,061,240
`root_title`	"One change to make science more open?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	74,044,932
`net_rshares`	420,562,637,495
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dhimmel	0 B		420,562,637,495	50%

@lemouth · Oct 26 '18

$0.02

Some journals also suck, in terms of the editorial team (regardless their impact factor):)

👍 dustbunny, dexterdev

`author`	lemouth
`permlink`	re-dexterdev-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181026t013426409z
`category`	science
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-10-26 01:34:27
`last_update`	2018-10-26 01:34:27
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-11-02 01:34:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.018 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.005 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	90
`author_reputation`	338,011,164,701,274
`root_title`	"One change to make science more open?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	74,061,321
`net_rshares`	22,208,466,111
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dexterdev	0 B		8,498,736,658	100%
dustbunny	0 B		13,709,729,453	5.83%

@justtryme90 · Oct 27 '18

I couldn't imagine what the *Nature* of this comment could be.

properties (22)

`author`	justtryme90
`permlink`	re-lemouth-re-dexterdev-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181027t203631734z
`category`	science
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-10-27 20:36:33
`last_update`	2018-10-27 20:36:33
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-11-03 20:36:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	62
`author_reputation`	140,118,479,939,905
`root_title`	"One change to make science more open?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	74,174,327
`net_rshares`	0

@lemouth · Oct 31 '18

I don't like Nature. A good journal, but a shitty non-open-access policy :)

properties (22)