create account

RE: One change to make science more open? by phortun

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dhimmel/one-change-to-make-science-more-open

· @phortun ·
$0.87
Well written Daniel, makes perfect sense even to me. Btw how is the situation with scientific articles here on Steemit? I know they should be available under the tag "steemstem" but I have not really looked into this part of the platform much. Are they good in general?
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorphortun
permlinkre-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t201747016z
categoryscience
json_metadata{"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-25 20:17:48
last_update2018-10-25 20:17:48
depth1
children5
last_payout2018-11-01 20:17:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.687 HBD
curator_payout_value0.183 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length269
author_reputation1,190,487,310,900,995
root_title"One change to make science more open?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id74,048,264
net_rshares790,662,479,953
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@dhimmel ·
$1.00
I don't know too much about science on Steem, besides that every now and then I meet some cool scientists who happen to also use Steem. Examples include @dexterdev, @trang, @lemouth, @scienceangel, and @andrewagostini.

There is something called @steemstem which tries to promote good science content on the platform but I haven't had much interaction with them. There are also some great science journalists such as @simoxenham.

I'm excited about Steem for science since it provides a venue for global discourse and realtime open science. Perhaps some communities will form based around SMTs. However, it's also an unresolved question whether Steem's incentive model's will be beneficial or destructive for knowledge production.
👍  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordhimmel
permlinkre-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t202941586z
categoryscience
json_metadata{"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.5.6","format":"markdown","tags":["science"],"users":["dexterdev","trang","lemouth","scienceangel","andrewagostini.","steemstem","simoxenham."],"links":["/@dexterdev","/@trang","/@lemouth","/@scienceangel","/@andrewagostini","/@steemstem","/@simoxenham"],"image":[]}
created2018-10-25 20:29:42
last_update2018-10-25 20:29:42
depth2
children4
last_payout2018-11-01 20:29:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.774 HBD
curator_payout_value0.225 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length730
author_reputation39,788,295,023,882
root_title"One change to make science more open?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id74,048,746
net_rshares888,994,184,670
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@phortun ·
$0.67
Wow, thanks for this brief insight into the Steem science :) I have been browsing through the posts in the trending page of the "steemstem" tag now and some of the titles sound very interesting. 

Good point with Steemit being a venue for global discourse and realtime open debates - not only for the Steemit community actually. Well, I am afraid nobody knows what the consquences of the SMT introduction will eventually be but I am hoping for the best.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorphortun
permlinkre-dhimmel-re-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t204358865z
categoryscience
json_metadata{"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-25 20:44:00
last_update2018-10-25 20:44:00
depth3
children3
last_payout2018-11-01 20:44:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.636 HBD
curator_payout_value0.032 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length453
author_reputation1,190,487,310,900,995
root_title"One change to make science more open?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id74,049,347
net_rshares731,675,282,679
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@lemouth ·
$1.08
I would wait and see for what concerns the SMTs. Here at SteemSTEM we are doing our best to promote science communication on Steem (and more), with the means we have. Feel free to reach us out on discord if you want to directly discuss with us.

Thanks @dhimmel for the mention :)
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorlemouth
permlinkre-phortun-re-dhimmel-re-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181026t012816299z
categoryscience
json_metadata{"tags":["science"],"users":["dhimmel"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-10-26 01:28:15
last_update2018-10-26 01:28:15
depth4
children2
last_payout2018-11-02 01:28:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.811 HBD
curator_payout_value0.268 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length280
author_reputation338,011,164,701,274
root_title"One change to make science more open?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id74,061,111
net_rshares925,860,828,557
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)