Viewing a response to: @dhimmel/one-change-to-make-science-more-open
Well written Daniel, makes perfect sense even to me. Btw how is the situation with scientific articles here on Steemit? I know they should be available under the tag "steemstem" but I have not really looked into this part of the platform much. Are they good in general?
author | phortun |
---|---|
permlink | re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t201747016z |
category | science |
json_metadata | {"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-10-25 20:17:48 |
last_update | 2018-10-25 20:17:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2018-11-01 20:17:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.687 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.183 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 269 |
author_reputation | 1,190,487,310,900,995 |
root_title | "One change to make science more open?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 74,048,264 |
net_rshares | 790,662,479,953 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dhimmel | 0 | 781,774,430,524 | 100% | ||
jolaos | 0 | 890,315,306 | 100% | ||
dexterdev | 0 | 7,997,734,123 | 100% |
I don't know too much about science on Steem, besides that every now and then I meet some cool scientists who happen to also use Steem. Examples include @dexterdev, @trang, @lemouth, @scienceangel, and @andrewagostini. There is something called @steemstem which tries to promote good science content on the platform but I haven't had much interaction with them. There are also some great science journalists such as @simoxenham. I'm excited about Steem for science since it provides a venue for global discourse and realtime open science. Perhaps some communities will form based around SMTs. However, it's also an unresolved question whether Steem's incentive model's will be beneficial or destructive for knowledge production.
author | dhimmel |
---|---|
permlink | re-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t202941586z |
category | science |
json_metadata | {"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.5.6","format":"markdown","tags":["science"],"users":["dexterdev","trang","lemouth","scienceangel","andrewagostini.","steemstem","simoxenham."],"links":["/@dexterdev","/@trang","/@lemouth","/@scienceangel","/@andrewagostini","/@steemstem","/@simoxenham"],"image":[]} |
created | 2018-10-25 20:29:42 |
last_update | 2018-10-25 20:29:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2018-11-01 20:29:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.774 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.225 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 730 |
author_reputation | 39,788,295,023,882 |
root_title | "One change to make science more open?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 74,048,746 |
net_rshares | 888,994,184,670 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dhimmel | 0 | 706,193,809,967 | 100% | ||
javierjmc | 0 | 559,078,985 | 100% | ||
phortun | 0 | 125,195,768,996 | 100% | ||
scienceangel | 0 | 36,773,867,298 | 100% | ||
dexterdev | 0 | 7,837,016,906 | 100% | ||
stoerte | 0 | 461,566,954 | 100% | ||
trang | 0 | 11,973,075,564 | 100% |
Wow, thanks for this brief insight into the Steem science :) I have been browsing through the posts in the trending page of the "steemstem" tag now and some of the titles sound very interesting. Good point with Steemit being a venue for global discourse and realtime open debates - not only for the Steemit community actually. Well, I am afraid nobody knows what the consquences of the SMT introduction will eventually be but I am hoping for the best.
author | phortun |
---|---|
permlink | re-dhimmel-re-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181025t204358865z |
category | science |
json_metadata | {"tags":["science"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-10-25 20:44:00 |
last_update | 2018-10-25 20:44:00 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2018-11-01 20:44:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.636 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.032 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 453 |
author_reputation | 1,190,487,310,900,995 |
root_title | "One change to make science more open?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 74,049,347 |
net_rshares | 731,675,282,679 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dhimmel | 0 | 723,085,987,331 | 100% | ||
jolaos | 0 | 909,484,485 | 100% | ||
dexterdev | 0 | 7,679,810,863 | 100% |
I would wait and see for what concerns the SMTs. Here at SteemSTEM we are doing our best to promote science communication on Steem (and more), with the means we have. Feel free to reach us out on discord if you want to directly discuss with us. Thanks @dhimmel for the mention :)
author | lemouth |
---|---|
permlink | re-phortun-re-dhimmel-re-phortun-re-dhimmel-one-change-to-make-science-more-open-20181026t012816299z |
category | science |
json_metadata | {"tags":["science"],"users":["dhimmel"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-10-26 01:28:15 |
last_update | 2018-10-26 01:28:15 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-11-02 01:28:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.811 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.268 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 280 |
author_reputation | 338,011,164,701,274 |
root_title | "One change to make science more open?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 74,061,111 |
net_rshares | 925,860,828,557 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dhimmel | 0 | 879,266,834,966 | 100% | ||
phortun | 0 | 39,068,482,114 | 30% | ||
dexterdev | 0 | 7,525,511,477 | 100% |