Viewing a response to: @culgin/how-usd50-000-saved-makerdao-from-potentially-losing-all-its-collateral-a-primer-on-bug-bounty-program
It's a very innovative program that looks for errors in parallel. I suppose these error hunters must have good intentions, as they are supposed to. I guess the verification work after reporting the bug should be an easy process to handle. To prevent the informant from losing patience. As you say, it depends on how substantial the reward is. pd: I support implementation in steem
author | yonnathang |
---|---|
permlink | pz26ue |
category | security |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-10-08 13:59:06 |
last_update | 2019-10-08 13:59:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-10-15 13:59:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 383 |
author_reputation | 383,337,297,686,248 |
root_title | "How $50,000 saved MakerDAO from potentially losing all its collateral - A primer on bug bounty program" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 91,350,284 |
net_rshares | 7,001,938,519 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
crypto.piotr | 0 | 7,001,938,519 | 1% |